When did the Democracy lie begin?

Question

Article IV section 4 of the US Constitution states: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government"

Franklin explained democracy as two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Jefferson described it as mob rule, or a tyrrany of the majority. John Adams said "Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." James Madison stated "Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their death." John Marshall "Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos."

When did the lie start? Who started it? And who would want to live in a democracy anyway?

also visit http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig5/chu6.html

Answer 1

You have made a good point libertyhasdied. If we could get rid of the democratic party all together what would we replace it with? People need options because it wouldn't be right not to. But I would like something different than the democratic party.

Answer 2

A democracy is where a bunch of people get together, and the majority tells the minority what to do. Might-makes-right mob rule.

A republic is where a bunch of people get together, and the majority gets to pick somebody to tell everybody what to do. Still might makes right, just one step closer to totalitarian government.

The only benefit of a republic is the hope that the person elected to make all the decisions will be rational and benevolent, and have the interests of the group at heart.

Look around you for what happens at the other end of the spectrum.

Answer 3

It is not a lie, per say, as a republic has democratic elements to it. The aforementioned founding fathers were talking about a pure democracy -- which they are quite correct about. To maximize the advantages of a democracy while avoiding tyranny of the masses, we threw in oligarchic elements in the form of a republic.

The leader of the executive branch and all members of the legislative branch are elected by the people (which would be the democratic elements). The judicial branch is selected by the executive branch and then confirmed by Congress (oligarchy). The people in charge are a group (oligarchy). The leaders are supposed to represent the opinions of their constituents (republic) while trying to also represent special interests and companies that helped them get elected (plutocracy). Of course, a leader that completely ignores their constituents will have a difficult time getting re-elected (democracy-republic).

So, while it is more correct to call us a republic, calling us a democracy is only a lie if they say 'pure democracy' as we have democratic elements to the government.

Answer 4

Democracy is an impossibility in the modern age with all of the greed and hatred that plagues humanity oh so badly. And you are right to say that it is a lie. The question should more come down to what is the ideal form of government, or the complete lacking of it.

Anarchism addresses many of these issues in depth and I thoroughly believe that the only solution for human kind is to return to a community based rule. Where the community, not the state makes all the decisions for itself.

For only when we return to this kind of governing, can we truly say that a democracy has been achieved. For a democracy by definition is for the people, by the people.

Quite frankly, democracy has not existed in this country since its foundation, and can only exist with a largescale change of heart and mind of the people.

Answer 5

solid ingredient we at the instant are not residing in a democracy. maximum of what you're complaining approximately is the fault of the folk contained in the U. S.. each and every physique. We grew to develop into complacent. We reelect corrupt politicians from the two events. we've not scrutinized our elected officers. they have been tromping on the form and our rights for lots too long. Now we are feeling the outcomes of our apathy. awaken united statesa.. pay interest. this is a thank you to have a solid government. this is how a representative Republic would desire to artwork. we are the final verify on our government. we are the government.

Answer 6

You are right. A pure democracy does not work. That is why we have a Constitutional Republic with a system of checks and balances. It fixes the problems you address in a democracy.

Answer 7

well think about this: athens (ancient greece) was the first... state that used democracy, and ended up in corruption...

Answer 8

check out www.jeanvaljeanlives.com