the muslim council , has stated that uk foreign policy is the reason young muslims want to be terrorists, can i suggest that if you dont like it, the answer is to go to a country that serves your purpose
2006-08-12 08:38:12 · 20 answers · asked by pat o 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
your right.....muslims wouldn't like to attak you if you were good to them.......nobody wants to live in war........terrorists werent born terrorists they just found america doing every thing to make them hate it......you can't stop terrorist attaks by killing terrorists because others will be terrorists if you resume your bad policy towaed them.........at least treat us like the way you treat jews!
2006-08-12 08:47:05 · answer #1 · answered by mido 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We shouldn't change foreign policy to suit one group of people. But we should change it if it's wrong.
Is supporting Israel wrong (that's why we're being attacked, after all)? That's up to you to decide for yourself. You can start with the UN resolutions passed against israel (the ones that weren't vetoed by the USA) and do your research from there.
Also might want to ask yourself if any state dedicated to a single race is a good thing, like an islamic state, or a jewish state, or aryan state...
2006-08-12 08:45:16 · answer #2 · answered by 006 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As the MP of Dewsbury Shahid Malik (this MP is muslim) said on national news yesterday, "if you do not appreciate or like they values and rules of this country, which offers you a lot more independence than any muslim country in the muslim state, then I suggest you leave".
2006-08-16 11:06:49 · answer #3 · answered by vino 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If changing the foreign policy means not occupying a foreign country and killing innocent iraqis and the loss of british and US soldiers all made up of lies by two pricks called Bush and Blair who make the airheaded public believe that their under attack all because of oil. Then am all for it.
2006-08-12 17:56:43 · answer #4 · answered by DEL N 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
U seem to be confused.If foreign policy stinks, going away is not a viable solution because it will still stink. Its not like going away if u don't like the country. Thats why its called foreign policy. Its got more to do with foreigners than its got to do with us. Going away may bring them directly under such foreign policy. like they have in Lebanon.Frankly they are better off whingeing about it here.Get me?
2006-08-12 11:07:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if Jewish asked u to change ur policy, u wont sleep untill u change it for them!
when u find a policy attacking other countries without reasons or at least encourages attacking them, and being racism against certian ppl and see that killing them is just like killing some ants. What these ppl gonna feel??
Hate and Revenge, ll be the answer.
thats why ur policy have to be changed
2006-08-12 11:49:04 · answer #6 · answered by kuky 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We should change our policy to suit Muslims if only because having let the buggers into our country they breed like rabbits and will eventually overwhelm our white anglo-saxon population and then become the largest grouping within our population.
Get used to it, either you or your kids or grandkids will be living under Sharia Law.
2006-08-12 09:24:45 · answer #7 · answered by Stuart G 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
43, what the hell does that, an action that happened hundreds of years ago, have anything to do with todays situation? At all?
We aren't persecuting anyone, if they don't like that we are attacking terrorists, who incidentally happen to share their religion, we shouldn't listen to them. They are terrorists and should be attacked as thus. We should respect the ideas of the majority, not a minority.
2006-08-12 08:54:35 · answer #8 · answered by AndyB 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you familiar to England's anti tartan laws of the 14th and 15th century.
All Scots were pre judged and sentenced to death. It was the responsibility of all England to immediately kill any Scott they encountered. Further if a Englishman did not kill a Scott he encountered than that same Englishman would be killed.
We could consider adopting a similar change to current policy.
Go big Red Go
2006-08-12 08:46:30 · answer #9 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why can't we change our foreign policy so that it doesn't annoy people? Plenty of other countries manage it, why can't we? And I thought the point of our foreign policy was to bring peace and democracy to the middle east - well that definately isn't going to happen, so why do we continue antagonising people?
2006-08-12 08:41:57 · answer #10 · answered by Mordent 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋