English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

32 answers

KERRY.. or anyone running against Bush, for that matter.

i didn't vote for bush the first time.. i certainly wouldn't do it a second time.

2006-08-12 08:20:44 · answer #1 · answered by brooke44 3 · 5 1

I voted for Kerry in '04 and would vote for him over Bush again.

2006-08-12 08:40:57 · answer #2 · answered by brian2412 7 · 1 0

I would not vote for Bush or Kerry I would still vote the same way I did in 2004 which was for Badnarik

2006-08-12 08:51:47 · answer #3 · answered by Christopher W 2 · 1 0

WOW. I did not know there were so many idiots out there...


KERRY all the way.

I've NEVER voted for Bush and I would NEVER vote for him or anyone related to him!!!

2006-08-12 08:24:13 · answer #4 · answered by one_sera_phim 5 · 3 0

It certainly wouldn't be Kerry. Remember, George Bush never shot a Vietnamese teen-ager in the back.

2006-08-12 08:22:24 · answer #5 · answered by Albannach 6 · 1 0

Kerry, Kerry, Kerry, Kerry. Kerry

But there again Bush would have his realitives rig the votes again.

2006-08-12 08:22:23 · answer #6 · answered by spiritwalker 6 · 2 0

Bush

2006-08-12 08:18:38 · answer #7 · answered by John 2 · 2 2

Bush. Kerry strikes me as a indecisive whiner.

2006-08-12 08:36:51 · answer #8 · answered by Shelia p 1 · 0 0

Kerry Bush is an idiot

2006-08-12 08:21:58 · answer #9 · answered by bisquedog 6 · 3 0

In this one party system what would be the difference?
Both parties are in bed with big money.

The "issues" brought to the table in elections are nothing more than hot button emotional blather that serve as a smoke screen to hide big money's true agenda.

One hand feeds the other.
Go ahead and vote, Americans lose either way.

2006-08-12 08:52:42 · answer #10 · answered by GJ 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers