The Israelis claim to that land is similar to the claims of Native Americans to lands in the USA. If it gets down to where people originate, then the US should be a Cherokee nation.
The land of Israel has changed hands many times throughout history. The Jews didn't even originate there, but were led there and then conquered their neighbors.
The creation of the state of Israel has important religious implications for Christians. The end times cannot come, and Christ cannot return, until all the Jews return home to Israel.
2006-08-12 07:16:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr Ed Intelligence 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your assertion of a Palestinian civilization existed before Israel occupied the land is patently false and is not supported by history.
The truth of the matter is that the palestinains have consistently refused to form a country and when Israel came, Syria and lebanon then refused to take the displaced people which they could have easily. This was done to promote hostility between the palestinians and Israel, as history shows it worked very well.
2006-08-12 07:16:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Archer Christifori 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
you won't be able to very probable base this over who the land was once promised to on the grounds that now no longer each and every individual believes interior the full "the land replaced into as quickly as promised to the jews" factor. no longer each and every individual has the comparable religious ideals. consequently the it belongs to the palestinians. The zionists have been incorrect of their shown fact that palestine was once "a land without a human beings for a people without a land" and the Belfour statement wherein the british signed palestine over to the jews will could be recognized null- and void. I quote: ""His Majesty's government view with desire the employer in Palestine of a countrywide living for the Jewish persons, and could use their great endeavors to facilitate the fulfillment of this merchandise, it being for sure understood that no longer something would be finished which will prejudice the civil and non secular rights of contemporary non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political attractiveness enjoyed by utilising Jews in yet another united states." the belfour assertion for sure states that palestine is given to the Jews on the priority the "no longer something could be carried out which could prejudice the civil and non secular rights of exitsting non-Jewish communities in Palestine" Israel has already broken that contract one hundred situations over. And one final factor- it extremely is very much primary that israel broke the end fire on november 4, 2008 so Hamas as an elected political group had the main dazzling to retaliate. Cheers : )
2016-12-17 09:40:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by menjivar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Turkish Ottoman empire owned this land. Since the natives did not take their land back, they forfeited any claim to it. In World War I, the Allies defeated Turkey, which had led a 500-year jihad against Europe, so the land was rightfully taken and could be used anyway the Allies wanted to. If Israel stole the land, they stole it from Turkey. Th
2006-08-12 07:14:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Palestinian Land. Go look at your history books and see how land was "actually divided up! Most of the lands were divided by tribes, not borders!
We have taken a lot of land that wasn't ours, Puerto Rico and Hawaii for instance!
2006-08-12 07:23:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
All of this planet was created. And the Creator gave the land to Israel as a permanent inheritance. Because evil people drove them out does not negate their ownership. The creation of the new state of Israel was an international recognition of this fact. Why are people such as yourself so stubborn in your refusal to allow Israel to exist? Is your hatred of jews so strong that you can not allow them to live?
2006-08-12 07:16:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by RunningOnMT 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
First, the land was British territory, it did not belong to the Palestinians......The Brits sold it to the UN to give to Israel.......they could not do that unless it was theres, right? The, the UN gave that land to Israel....so there was no stealing by Israel, and nor by the UN.....if anyone stole anything, I guess that would have to be the Brits, and I refuse to say that.....so you do it, and let all of the English jump on you
2006-08-12 07:12:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Remember the Moslem's' stole the land from the Jews back in mid 700 AD when the first crusades were Arab Invaders!!
2006-08-12 08:15:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by DALE B 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Read your history. When the British pulled out of Palestine in 1945, a good bit of that land ended up as parts of Jordan and Syria. Would you say that they stole that land, too?
Same for Iraq. When the British pulled out, Iraq should have been three separate nations (Sunni, Shiite, and Kurd). Comments, please?
2006-08-12 07:16:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by F. Frederick Skitty 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's this quasi-religious mess cooked up by the US, British and the UN for the benefit of a few zionists in 1948.
It's supposed to be a secular government, but is based on a religious tenet.
It's supposed to be a place for Jews to go for a homeland, but they refuse to go there and live.
It's supposed to be a First World country, but it receives more financial and military aid than all other countries in the world COMBINED.
There isn't anything at all about Israel that is true or real or uncontrived.
2006-08-12 07:10:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by nora22000 7
·
1⤊
3⤋