I just finished the game, and I thought the ending was somewhat incomplete. It almost as if the producers of the game were going for an 'The Empire Strikes Back' or 'Attack of the Clones' feel. What do you think?
Personally, I think they should title it 'The Return of Reven'. (Give it a 'Return of the Jedi' feel.
2006-08-12 06:25:48 · 3 answers · asked by Oklahoman 6 in Games & Recreation ➔ Video & Online Games
Good question.
1. The 360 and PS3 are light years beyond current gaming systems. KOTOR III is begging to be made on these platforms. Honestly; i'd expect to see it some time next year.
2. The first two were not only incomplete, but they were buggy. The power-leveling glitch in the first one alone is an indication of holes left in an incomplete game because of a rush to finish the product.
3. Part 2 tried to continue the story from part one and ended up leaving you with more questions than answers.
4. AND, my biggest argument is this: If you have the ability to play both good and evil, and the outcome of the game is directly affected by the choices you make... why does KOTOR II only follow the story if you had played the first one from a Jedi perspective? If you had beaten the first game from a Sith perspective, the KOTOR II story would have been very different.
2006-08-12 06:37:09 · answer #1 · answered by furious_male 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The ending was kind of inconclusive, but Bioware has now gone on to other projects (Jade empire, some next-gen stuff) so its likely that if there is a KOTOR 3 it will be made by another company. (Inferior: Maybe. Different: Definitley)
2006-08-12 06:29:59 · answer #2 · answered by DonSoze 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yesssssssss
2006-08-12 06:30:07 · answer #3 · answered by Ty R 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋