He’s already admitted- “I'm also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time thinking about myself, about why I do things." —George W. Bush, aboard Air Force One, June 4, 2003
No matter how you try to defend him he keeps opening his mouth. Do you ever notice that there were never these accusations about Nixon no matter how much we liberals hated him? Because what ever else Nixon was we knew he was smart. Deeply twisted, bitter, evil, and batshit crazy, but smart.
Admit it, you’re embarrassed.
2006-08-12 05:21:19 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
analytical--adjective
Able to reason validly: analytic, logical, rational.
See reason
I know many analytical people, I'm a Liberal, Dearheart.
2006-08-12 05:47:41 · update #1
Well Clinton got a ********! Nothing could be more important than that. We have had enough intelligent presidents, and look what it got us. Now we have a stupid president and everything is wonderful. A wonderful war we all love, two now actually, a trillion dollar debt to Communist China, global warming, yeah things are great. And gas is up to $3 + a gallon. There is nothing wrong with having a stupid president, things are gonna work out fine. Ha ha
2006-08-12 05:26:24 · answer #1 · answered by jxt299 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I will admit that Bush isn't near as smart as Clinton, Blair and even Kerry. But he has the balls and wisdom to do whats right despite the worlds hatred towards him. Smarts doesn't always guarantee one will do the right thing or know the right thing to do. The Germans were an extremely smart nation, and still are, yet they were ruled by the third riech.
2006-08-12 12:37:16 · answer #2 · answered by lend322 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think I would be more embarrassed about those who elected the crack -head. The fact that he is a 5 watt light bulb, nice but not too bright, is ancient history. The other glaring fact is that it took more than a handful of Democrats to help get this nutbar elected.
2006-08-12 12:34:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
When he was typecast in the movie as Forrest Gump, we found him cute. So now the rehearsals are finished and we get the real stuff, how can we be upset? We are not embarrassed. We are a little peeved that the movie-makers did not script that he would have been leader--twice.
Boaz.
2006-08-12 12:32:44 · answer #4 · answered by Boaz 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Admit it, your a dumbass
That nut above me "nora" obvisouly hasn't picked up a history book to read that Reagan was the best President in our great nations history.
2006-08-12 12:48:15 · answer #5 · answered by John 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Embarrassed?
You side put Gore and Kerry up to run. Talk about embarrassment. They got worst grades in collage. Gore still thinks he invented the intranet.
2006-08-12 12:28:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Last time I heard Pres. Clinton did not know what the meaning of the word "is" is. And in case he is reading these:
IS - (Verb)
Third-person singular present tense (sometimes past tense and conditional tense) of to be.
2006-08-12 12:40:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not many people are analytical. Do you even know what that means? I'm not embarrassed for my President. I am embarrassed that we have so many pea brains in this country, that ask questions such as this.
2006-08-12 12:26:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I feel sorry for You because You seem to only be another oppressed liberal and jealous of your lack of power.
2006-08-13 13:09:37 · answer #9 · answered by Neal 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We barely survived Reagan, who left us with trillion dollar deficits and ravaged freedoms. Now we get W, who has even less on the ball. Everyone in this country has reason to be embarrassed, two times over.
2006-08-12 12:42:41 · answer #10 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋