This is actually a good question! Suppose 1/p has a cycle length of n. Then (1/p)*10^n -(1/p) will be an integer, so p divides 10^n -1. It is pretty clear that the converse holds also; that is, if p divides 10^n -1, then 1/p cycles after a stretch of length n. So what we really want is the smallest n so that p divides 10^n -1. This is 'the order of 10 in the group of units modulo p'.
For example, since 11 divides 10^2 -1=99 and not 10^1 -1=9, we see that 1/11 repeats after 2 steps. Now, it is known that if k is the number of integers less than p that have no factors in common with p, then 10^k -1 is divisible by p. It is also known that the smallest n above will divide this value of k. So for example, with p=11, k=10, but n=2. Notice that 2 does divide 10.
Because of the nature of k, it is good to look at values of p that are prime. For example, p=59 has a repeat length of 58. It is easy to see that 1/17 has a cycle length of 16.
2006-08-12 09:21:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by mathematician 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
That's because it is a 'rational' number. One that can be expressed as the quotient of two integers.
But the 'irrational' numbers (such as Ï and â2) have decimal expansions that never repeat and never end.
Why do
22/7 = 3.1428571428571428571428571428571
and
43/7 = 6.1428571428571428571428571428571
have the same decimal parts?
It's because 43-22 = 21 which is an exact multiple of 7. In fact 21 = 7*3 and the difference in the integer parts is exactly 3.
But it's good that you noticed that. Why? Because in higher math the remainder is sometimes *much* more important then the quotient. Especially in things like number theory.
Doug
2006-08-12 06:50:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by doug_donaghue 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
What about 22/7?
2006-08-12 05:23:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In general, if the number does not have 2 or 5 as a factor, then the larger the number is, the longer the sequence *could* be. I don't know if it always is longer though.
For a number n, the sequence will never be longer than n. Or mayb it's n-1. When you get old like me, a lot of information starts falling out of your memory :(
2006-08-12 06:26:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ken H 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1/23= .043478208695652173613 repeating
21#'s repeating
1/31= .032258064516129032258064516129 repeating
30#'s
2006-08-18 08:27:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Luigi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
a prime number
find the largest prime number and the make a reciprocal of it.
From what I have done the larger the number
longer the cycle is if it is a prime number
may have a answer to question
http://www.answers.com/main/ntq-tname-unique%252Dprime-fts_start-
2006-08-12 07:00:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by zzjoev 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
68/7=9.7 and repeating 14286
2006-08-18 07:50:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brand-i 1
·
0⤊
0⤋