English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

This is a very simplistic view and is more abot you wishing to express disatisfaction with the world than thinking this question through or een researching it.

Bothered to look at Bill Gates or Warran Buffet lately ?
The worlds richest man and someone who was once.

They are both committed to giving away their fortunes by 2009.

Bill gates and his wife melissa have spent billions on charity work the last few years and intend to spend billions more.

People become rich through luck, circumstance, hard work or a variety of other reasons. what they do with that wealth is no different to wha the man in the street does with it. Some spend wisely and some spend it on gambling and other vices. Simply making a comment based on how much wealth someone has makes them liable for the worlds problems is a hollow and flimsy statement.

Collectively the average man in the world is more than capable of shaping the planet and dealing with it's problems.

Look at the link..then consider your view and question.

2006-08-12 05:01:28 · answer #1 · answered by targetdummy2002 1 · 3 0

Rich people are not to blame. First you stereotype them. "rich people" signals ignorance. So, you know think every rich person is to blame for poverty. Well lots help charities etc.
Also, the government yes they could do more, but they need to look after number own, their own country first. They do help in fact.
Truth be known we are all to blame. Every tax paying citizen anyway. Have you ever brought a piece of clothing you did not really need or a CD? I mean music isn't even a requirement to live. You could have donated that money to charity. So before you blame all "rich people" you are not blameless like everyone else is not.
You cannot generalise in that matter, as it is not true at all.
I see what you are getting at to an extent, but we could all do more and help in some way or another.
Also, these "mega rich people" have generally worked so hard for their money and deserve it, and we have a such thing as free will so they can do what they want with their money.
You obviously have a computer, or access to one. Perhaps you should sell it and donate the money else maybe they could blame you for the poverty they are in.

2006-08-12 06:13:06 · answer #2 · answered by becky_ms 4 · 0 0

Those mega-rich who are to blame for the poverty in the world are not the same ones we read about in the magazines. Their names are not part of the common knowledge. They make some other stuff, not computers. Try guns and such.

2006-08-12 05:11:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Mega rich are not responsible for the worlds poor. The mega rich pay nearly 90% of all the taxes in this country. They provide good and not so good paying jobs for millions of people.
Goverments on the other hand are responsible, just look at the arab countries for one example, true there a few mega rich arabs but it's the goverment that allows them to exploit it's people.

2006-08-12 05:03:14 · answer #4 · answered by geotom 3 · 0 1

The riches people in the world are the biggest contributors to the Red Cross and hundreds of other organizations developed to help people in need. If everyone was middle class or poor , there would not be wealthly people to support these groups. I understand your jealously of wealthly people - usually these people have worked hard, and sacrificed a lot. Look at Bill Gates and Warren Buffett- Both contributing millions of dollars each day.

2006-08-12 05:07:14 · answer #5 · answered by weswe 5 · 0 0

Most mega rich people do not care, their money is their God and their reason for living, everyone else it litter, they are unhappy people and their lack of compassion shows in their lack of respect. This is not a life that I would choose.

2006-08-12 05:06:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I don't see how wealthier people are to blame, when poverty occurs because people a) don't want to work or b)don't have a good job because they obviously didn't go to school.

2006-08-12 04:57:02 · answer #7 · answered by AnF model Ryan 2 · 1 0

that's positive. those on the marvelous had the techniques, worked problematic and took the risks. Capitalism drives progression, the place human beings get lazy under communist platforms the place working harder does not repay a similar way. yet, capitalism in hassle-free terms works whilst the regulations are honest and strictly enforced. that's what we've lost. whilst firms have been first formed contained in the u . s . a ., they actually had to coach a income to the rustic because of the fact our clever foerfathers observed the risk. Now, they wreck our economic gadget and are a risk to national protection, yet they offered "our" government and are accepted to do it. The Federal Reserve economic enterprise is carefully unconstitutional. Congress replaced into meant to concern foreign places money sponsored by utilising invaluable metals, no interest ever had to be paid by utilising the u . s . a . to a private economic enterprise. The founding fathers quite warned in regards to the risks of a private economic enterprise issuing foreign places money. the genuine situation is... we've been given poorer than ever as they have been given richer than ever because of the treason of "globalism", which by utilising it somewhat is totally nature rewards slavery and brings down countries with a respectable oftentimes happening of residing. We have been fooled and could not at all have allowed it. "Globalism" isn't "unfastened commerce", it enslaves the international by utilising hiring in hassle-free terms the main oppressed workers and funnels all wealth to the marvelous. they do no longer even care if their very own agencies or countries are destroyed by utilising what they have achieved to the economic gadget, goodbye as they finally end up with basically approximately each and every thing on the tip of the interest. Now, they have even controlled to maintain their income whilst they prevail and pass their losses onto us whilst they fail (bailouts for the "too enormous to fail"), so as that they are not even assuming any risks to earn their super income, that's meant to hitch what justifies them. What we've got could be fascism, a central authority controlled by utilising economic hobbies, no longer capitalism interior the healthful confines of regulation and nationalism. those in government are transforming into too wealthy with the aid of payoffs for handing us over to the "globalists" and making rules that for the time of hassle-free terms income them and their "globalist" masters. government officers are even allowed to do insider procuring and advertising at this element! What we decide on is regulation and order and to come again to The shape.

2016-09-29 04:47:47 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'm sure they do realize it but they are mega rich so why should they care.

2006-08-12 04:54:09 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 0 1

Really?

2006-08-12 04:56:50 · answer #10 · answered by zara c 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers