cause they not man enough
in Germany we have the most liberals.
the problem is that they want make all right, they're too liberal
not man enough they are to speak out that muslims hate all christs and western countries and life
2006-08-12 03:15:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
It may seem that way to morons like you, but as a liberal I'm about fighting the root cause of terrorism. If you take a look at the countries where muslim extremism has a firm foundation, you'll see high unemployment rates, illiteracy rates, and brutal U.S. backed dictatorships. Imagine that, U.S. backed dictators. Can we say Saddam? Or how about the Shah of Iran?
The U.S. claims that it backs democracy, but if you look at are history, we've consistently overthrown democratically elected governments that just don't happen to agree with our views of democracy. Like we did in Iran back in the 50's. We overthrew a DEMOCRATICALLY elected government because the OIL companies didn't like the fact that the government of Iran was taxing them. So we install the Shah who brutalized his own people until 1979.
Do you know where the term banana republic came from? It was the U.S. overthrowing a central american country, Nicaragua I believe it was. And look at what happened there.
We're now reaping the years of bad foreign policy and yet this administration wants to continue them. Hugo Chavez is right in being scared of the U.S. Your president did try to overthrow him at the behest of the oil companies. The CIA was working out of Bolivia.
I'm a liberal that has given 10 years of his life defending the Constitution. I've looked at the results of this foreign policy and I can no longer follow the orders of the President.
I don't side with the enemies. Some of them have legitimate beefs, but by carrying out terrorist attacks you lose your message. You've made yourself a criminal and must be brought to justice.
So my answer is this: Let's attack the root causes of terrorism. Remove their soapbox. And abandon a foreign policy that DOES NOT work.
But let me guess, I lost you at moron and you never finished reading this. Just like a con. Ask a question and never stick around for an answer.
2006-08-12 03:38:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by darkemoregan 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
The Liberals think they have all the answers. Especially now when the whole world seems to be in chaos. Change can be good but it should also be well-thought out - the Liberals don't do that.
Personally, I think they do this because they regret their own past history of prejudice and disregard for others. It's like trying to make up for it up all at once.
2006-08-12 07:09:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by purplewings123 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
maybe "liberals" unlike "conservatives" whatever the hell those labels mean,do their homework and investigate the problems in depth with an eye toward solving them. Instead of forming tunnel vision to validate what political position you would like to believe.
For example,if you think we are in Iraq to protect democracy on our shores then I have some more snake oil that I would sell you!
Since we have invaded Iraq has peace been more evident in the world? Did we make the world safe for democracy? I rest my case!
Maybe those anti-americans are crying out for help -trying to get our attention. Cowardice and stupidity is when you refuse to listen.
2006-08-12 03:22:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by worriedaboutyou 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
We should all consider what has gone on in the past and also realize that many more nations have the power to destroy all of society. There is no choice but to try and get along with other people unless you're comfortable with world destruction. Many intelligent people have voiced these concerns before including Albert Einstein, Dwight Eisenhower and Douglas McArthur...listen to them.
2006-08-12 03:18:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
the certainty that, as you state, this society has super freedoms is the rationalization that a distinctive and policitally opinionated citizenry can nonetheless be united below one flag. We liberals seek for a extra suited society, one the place those freedoms are actually not given over to an expert geared up on concern. As for enjoying large with the enemy, that's what subtle rulers around the international have completed to develop their very very own schedule. We tolerated Stalinist Russia in the process the 2d WW by using fact they have been the enemy of the Axis and "the enemy of my enemy is my pal". that replaced directly as quickly by using fact the conflict replaced into over - we entered a protracted era of covert hostilities with Communism. As for our relationship with Hitler, it replaced into the very liberal government of FDR that labored with the ecu powers to obliterate Hitler. long till now the conservative American public replaced into keen to take on the German, Italian and eastern forces, Roosevelt tapped George Marshall to artwork with Churchill to strengthen their conflict attempt. Please additionally bear in mind the super attempt that considered one of your man or woman, Richard Nixon, made to play large with an enemy (that's named international kinfolk, with the aid of the way). He has the international's admiration for establishing the door to commerce with China. without that attempt, they could be an enemy the like of which we've in no way seen. as a replace, they're now finding out to purchase and advertising companions. i don't desire to go away the midsection East till we've a non violent answer to the huge issues there, yet i don't have faith that what we are at present doing works. That makes me very afraid. Very afraid. yet i could rather be frightened of terrorists, than of my very very own government. And the liberties that are being slowly leached away with the aid of the present administration are extra durable to interchange than lose.
2016-10-01 23:50:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why does the national dialogue of a free country categorize all speech that questions the present authority as treasonous or sympathetic with the enemy? Why is there no disctinction between love of one's country and support for the specific policies of a particular administration?
2006-08-12 03:16:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by skusabd 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
I do think that liberals tend to have sympathy for the devil a lot. They make over intellectualized psychological analysis of people who do bad things, essentially making excuses for their bad actions and seemingly like they are absolving them.
This also has to be taken that the "enemy" is often in a grey area, for instance, WMD was provided by the american government. And their are many other instances where conservative leaders have sided with evil and brutal regimes, actually countless times, who caused much horror.
When you live in a narrow minded world of black and white and just side with your own party blindly, it is easy to see that your side is always right and the other side which is often demonized is always wrong, however, when the brutal inconvenient truth rears it's head, it takes a bigger person to accept it.
Usually blind faith political hacks, like yourself, have a hard time processing that kind of information.
2006-08-12 03:17:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
You have to be the dumbest mother f ucker on this forum.
Hate has blinded you so badly. Don't you have a doctors appointment to go to so they can medicate you properly. All of your questions are nothing more than hate filled dribble. I am willing to bet (and provide 10 to 1 odds) that you solely want just one political party and of course that would be the one of your choice...which by definition is the most Un-American view to have. So stop pointing fingers and generating hate among Americans and read a book...take a vacation...something to relieve your unwarranted stress level and your "fake" rage.
2006-08-12 03:30:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Charlooch 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
I have been on this site for weeks saying that the only people against this war in IRAQ are Saddam, Osama, and the Democrats.
They have so much hatred for the conservatives that it is affecting their common sense (if they EVER had any).
Americans should ALL WORK TOGETHER to defeat terrorism. The liberals are working not to defeat the terrorists but to defeat the Republicans.
Is Cindy Sheehan Muslim now? I think she is...
2006-08-12 03:15:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
They can't agree with what the Republicans do.
Please observe the US political rule book.
Rule #1
If the other guys support it-Oppose it
Rule #2
If the other guys oppose it-Support it
Rule #3
Blame the other guy for all of the problems with any situation
Rule #4
Get ready for election day note the following schedule:
If you are a representative it is less than 2 years away.
If you are the president it is less than 4 years away
if you are a senator it is less than 6 years away
Rule #5
If you aren't running for re-election get as much as you can for you and your campaign financers-er I mean contituants.
2006-08-12 03:17:11
·
answer #11
·
answered by David T 3
·
5⤊
2⤋