2006-08-12 02:54:17 · 11 answers · asked by Olivia 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes I do. Cheney is absolutely right. I think a lot of people are still unaware (I am CT Republican) of just how much of a wack-job this Lamont is. His position on Iraq is to leave now, in defeat. If we did so, we would be telling the world that we will turn around our ship of state around based on only a few terrorists with a few bombs. If the world sees that, than we will see no end to violence as forces try to get the USA to do this and do that with car bombs. We would have given a green light to more terrorism. The opposite is also true. If we show our resolve, than our enemies will see that terrorism will not achieve the results they want.
2006-08-12 03:01:12 · answer #1 · answered by John16 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think choosing to NOT vote for Lieberman because he is willing to work with the administration and because he is a "strong on military" democrat does show that some people just don't get it.
Lieberman voted with his party 90% of the time, but because he bow to to the far, far left, his party cannibalized him. If this is a trend it does bode poorly for the USA because it does send the message that the terrorist can win just by keeping the war going and getting the far left in power.
This does NOT make us safer.
2006-08-12 03:30:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only reason lamont won is because Liberman took a stand for the war on terrorism. lamont ranted and raved about war this and war that. His (lamont) true yellow damnocrat colors showed proving that damnocrats support the terrorist
2006-08-12 03:04:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dick Cheney wants to kiss my big black a*ss. The man has done more for the alienation of the US than all the tyrants that this world has seen. He must be worried about his halliburton stock.
2006-08-12 03:08:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think there are enough hawks to offset Lamont, there are a few pro-war Dems out there who are carrying a strong standing in their states. One senator is not going to throw us off too much, plus he hasn't won the seat yet.
2006-08-12 03:05:33 · answer #5 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
conceitedness, and now possibly a sprint desperation? yet i'm making a guess that Ol' Dicky Boy might have his finger contained in direction of any upcoming attack. That guy is evil incarnate. They enable 3000 of our electorate die to get into Iraq (between different issues) so i does no longer positioned it previous him to have something up his sleeve if he's pressed.
2016-11-04 10:34:54 · answer #6 · answered by lurette 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dick cheney has never been accused of having a grip on reality...
2006-08-12 03:41:36 · answer #7 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vulnerable to what? It has been proven terror strikes can occur reguardless of which party holds office.
2006-08-12 02:58:02 · answer #8 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sounds to me like Adam Sandler"I want everybody to remember why they need us"
2006-08-12 03:00:33 · answer #9 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They don't call him Dick for nothing, now do they?
2006-08-12 02:57:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋