OK libs, all we hear from you is "why hasn't Bush caught Bin Laden yet?". Well what do you want to do to him when he is finally captured? put him on trial? kill him? put him in minimum security prison with work release privilages?let him go like Bill Clinton?, maybe you think that he is just misunderstood and had every right to attack America because we are so evil and deserved it. Lets hear your liberal answers!
2006-08-12 02:35:46 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no cliff, not dumb at all when it comes to getting an answer from a lib.
2006-08-12 02:49:46 · update #1
LOL
I'm not a Liberal but I like your question. Hopefully, they won't give him a tea party to discuss his sad childhood....but with that group, you just never know. Once he's caught he would become the "underdog" and liberals always rush to help the underdog.
2006-08-12 02:40:39 · answer #1 · answered by purplewings123 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
You do realize that it's the libs that are outraged that Bush disbanded the units that were specifically set up to catch OBL right?
I didn't think so.
As for the CIA meeting with him in Djibouti, it never happened. Really. Check it out. I mean REALLY look at the facts, not what the Loose Change loonies want you to believe. Their claims are so shot full of hole, I couldn't stop laughing through out the movie.
But back to the question:
If we ever catch him, he needs to be brought to justice. Unfortunately, it may have to be at the Hague. Because no matter the outcome of the trial the U.S. gives him, terrorist organizations will claim that the trial was already fixed. And it'll just go to support their cause. I'd prefer an american trial with the death penalty as the only solution. No life without parole. Guilty, you're dead. That simple.
And I'm a liberal and I whole-heartedly endurse the death penalty.
2006-08-12 03:16:58 · answer #2 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The CIA met with Bin Laden in a hospital the day after the 9/11 attacks, so it's safe to say that the Bush administration doesn't want him to be found so as to further justify the grotesque spending to arms dealers and oil barrens. If he gets caught, he should be tried at the World Court for genocide as most Western nations had citizens killed that day. Then he will rot in a cell forever....execution is too good for a guy like that.
2006-08-12 02:50:45 · answer #3 · answered by PALADIN 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you looking for some idiotic answer to fuel you're bias? What makes you think a liberal would want lesser justice if this guy is caught and proven guilty of crimes against humanity? I am a liberal, my friend. I believe the punishment must fit the crime. As a liberal, I want to make the world a better place in which to live. If Bin Laden is proven guilty, wouldn't you agree the world would be a better place without him? An eye for an eye would certainly apply in this situation.
You need to realign you own thinking and try to eliminate a little bias against your own countrymen. We're all on the same side of the ramparts, conservatives and liberal Americans alike. You need to quit shooting at you're own countrymen. You're letting these fanatic terrorists divide us. We must stand united.
2006-08-12 02:53:46 · answer #4 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because, and please attempt to appreciate this, the economic device crash in 2008. back once you've been saying there is not any way a black guy will ever be president. attempt to keep in recommendations, McCain got here out of the RNC with a delightful surge contained in the polls. For a at the same time as, it known like he could over take Obama, Then something occurred that stopped his momentum lifeless in that's tracks. Do you keep in recommendations what that replaced into? the bottom fell out of the abode of playing cards that replaced into the Bush economic device. merely imagine, if Bush held it at the same time for very few more effective months, we may nonetheless have a white president (and a dolt for a vice president) As for paying for Bin encumbered, what precisely did we learn from waterboarding that we did not already recognize without it. so a options as all and distinctive replaced into in a position to inform me, merely the shown actuality that Bin encumbered had a courier. Like we did not recognize that. all and distinctive knew that is how his press releases were getting out. We found the guy 8 months in the past, accompanied him to the compound, then conceived, planned, and performed the plan, all at the same time as Bush hid from his legacy down in Texas.
2016-11-24 21:32:21 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Bin Laden is still alive (which I doubt) and we did manage to find him, I'd assume that we'd have him prosecuted by the UN, rather than a Middle Eastern country. Unlike Saddam, he isn't a despised figure. Or maybe we could have the Swiss prosecute him.
2006-08-12 02:45:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Perhaps we can let him go back into business with W's family again and give them a chance to catch up.
Perhaps we can have him teach at the CIA to show them how he improved in the things that they taught him when he was fighting the Russians in Afganistan.
2006-08-12 02:46:38 · answer #7 · answered by jdnmsedsacrasac1 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The point your question makes is that Liberals are the only ones interested in catching him unlike the current administration that doesn't. Thank you for pointing that out.
2006-08-12 02:50:59 · answer #8 · answered by Charlooch 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the damnocrats will make him a poster boy for their party since bin laden and the damnocrats share the same views about America
2006-08-12 03:01:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush promised to catch him "Dead or Alive."
That's the point. Bush and his people are completely incompetent in every way.
And to you, I don't mind a bit saying, "We told you so."
2006-08-12 02:42:40 · answer #10 · answered by wmp55 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋