Perhaps if we were only to Concentrate the population, like in Special Camps. I'd sure breathe easier. I wonder why no good man in human history hasn't had this very same idea.
2006-08-11 21:30:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
1 out of every 3 people that go through customs looks suspisious... have just come back from an out of the country vacation, (also, I am a white middle class male with no distinguishing characteristics who has had USA citizenship all my life) I am glad they let all the suspisious ones back in or atleast 1 of the 4 people in my family would have been declined comming back home.
Just because someone looks suspisious doesnt mean they are guilty or that we can mistreat them. You should read up on the First AND Second Red Scares and how much money in retributions that ended up costing the USA government and people.
2006-08-11 21:37:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by MB_Bailey 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yeah and most serial killers are white, why not ban them from the United States? Don't judge an entire race by the actions of a few. By the way, those guys were all British born same as the ones that did the subway bombs.
2006-08-11 21:37:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
whilst all this terror kicked of there have been such a lot of can provide that those phsychotic idiots could in no way replace our way of existence or our middle values. Sorry, yet our who legal gadget relies on the thought you're harmless till shown to blame and you may't be punished till 12 of your friends have heard the arguements and made their counseled determination. If the evidence is there to realize a conviction or pass to courtroom they could be arrested besides, if there is no evidence or evidence which will not be able to be recent in a speedy (few hours) seek of their residing house or place of work then its incorrect to punish somebody. in this concept the police ought to arrest Tony Blair and George Bush for ordering assaults on different states, in simple terms like Osama Bin weighted down did. distinctive weapons, yet comparable concept, in simple terms by using fact its retaliation doesnt make it superb suited. they have brought about terror and destabilised finished international locations for some years to return. If thats not terror then I dont know what's. No, all allegations might desire to recieve suitable judicial technique, in any different case those terrorists have carried out their objectives. What occurs whilst no evidence is ever got here across, in simple terms by using fact a senior police officer or baby-kisser thinks they could have commited against the regulation. Do they stayed locked up indefinately? Its an identical with those administration orders, those human beings in no way pass to courtroom, in no way recieve an ordeal yet have extensive regulations on their lives, no information superhighway or cellular telephones, curfews, families can't stay with them, can in basic terms pass to human beings whilst they have been given permission. I for one, won't stay in a rustic that detains human beings at no fee or good reason (accusing somebody of against the regulation without trial or evidence isn't an outstanding reason). i'm hoping that all and sundry politicians oppose this vehemently as they have interior the previous, and bring the shrink down from 28 days to on the main 7. Police ought to get extra suited at their interest, as a replace of detaining regulation abiding musilms (it rather is going to come all the way down to this, arresting 'suspicious' muslims and thoroughly dividing the country and supply terroist leaders and teacherrs extra ammunition and extra disallusioned youths) at their whim. manage those with know and that they are going to help give up the violence.
2016-10-01 23:41:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If 99% are terror suspects, it is only because most of them are suspected only because they are Pakistani.
2006-08-12 05:38:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dr Ed Intelligence 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
99% of pakistanis are terror suspects?
Where did you get that data?
Most of the 911 hijackers were SAUDIs
2006-08-11 21:28:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by willberb 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
On what do you base the fact of 99%?
2006-08-11 21:28:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by deathshead999 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
with condition that the have links with Al qaida - there are so many innocent people too.Pakistan knows all the Al qaida contacts all over the world where they are hiding.Their president is Chor Number - 1. Or Dawood Ibrahim and gang cant hide o long in Pak - they know it all
2006-08-11 21:34:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by raajz 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Please read what you just wrote; "knowing the fact that 99% are terror suspects?"
Who's fact?
Assuming they're "suspects" doesn't make them so!
Another product of the American Educational System. Where you from homey! That's awfully white of you!
2006-08-11 21:33:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kinder Warrior 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
as carlos mencia says....
its there turn.... not all of them are terror suspects. and out of the ones who are, maybe 10% are actually terrorists.... would you like the govt to kick you out of the country because of the white boys who shot up columbine?...... no i think not
2006-08-11 21:35:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by MstrChief55 5
·
0⤊
1⤋