The solution to the war in Iraq is to take the offensive. We have been fighting with our hands in our gloves. We have been fighting a "political correctness mentality" that the liberals demand. What we should do differently is set up torture chambers and televise it to the world, to show to the terrorist that we will do what you do, and also send a bomb your way. Supporters and people who give comfort to the enemy is fair game to die, so we should send the message to these religious nuts, that they are facing their best friends or their worst devil. Send one to mecca!
2006-08-11 18:54:14 · 6 answers · asked by debater 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
We shouda taken the Saudi oil fields in 1974 and we didn't.
We shoulda gone to Baghdad in 1991, butr we didn't.
We shoulda kept Bush Sr.'s lousy cease fire and UN inspections regimen, but Clinton and Maddie Albright THREW IT AWAY in August of 1998 (and when the winners throw away a cease fire, it means another war is inevitable).
We shoulda stayed out of Iraq in 2003 because there were no WMD and it would overcomit us to an area of less than first level strategic interest, but we went in, but we FAILED to follow a workable plan, which would have been to firebomb the Sunni cities and Sunni neighborhoods of Baghdad and then partition the country into Kurdistan and a Shi'ite nation (or Iranian province --their choice).
Now, after all these idiotic bi-partisan blunders over the last 30 years, you want "the solution to the war in Iraq?"
OK, partition the country and get out as fast as possible. We need every veteran troop for the mess that is brewing in North Korea and/or in Pakistan.
Free Kurdistan. Flush the rest.
2006-08-11 19:03:27 · answer #1 · answered by urbancoyote 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmm thats a no longer undemanding one... a million. im with the guy above me, get the iraqi military up and working. the only subject is that the iraqi military and police play the two factors of the fence, the 2nd we bypass away hell will destroy lose... corrupt bastards. 2. positioned a end to all of this politically maximum dazzling ROE "regulations of engagement" crap. If a motor vehicle is following convoys accumulating intel, shoot em. Iraqi military basically happens to be close to by utilising whilst a IED basically so happens to be interior the main dazzling place on the main dazzling time? Shoot them! 3. I actual dont think of there is one, the only actual looking concept i can arise with that has a great gamble in hell of working is. stay there for yet another 15-2 many years untill those little toddlers that adore us and prefer us develop into adult males and females able to rendering a civilized society.
2016-12-17 09:27:38 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are there in Iraq for a reason. That reason is not just what our govt. tells us.Our country has been standing by Isreali since it was reborn again. We are the Gentile nation that is ordained by God to be beside Isreali before Christ comes back. Isreali's enemys are our enimies also.It is in the Bible that there will be one that will bring a false peace in the Middle East. When you see that and him you will be looking at the anti-christ . Jesus want be far off coming back.
2006-08-11 19:20:07 · answer #3 · answered by Papa WILL 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
War is never the answer. Look at the site http://lastdayswarning.clearwire.net/
It says that there will be nuclear war in the middle-east by Sept. 12, 2006.
Take a look it has detailed information of why not just 'I believe'. Real proof that you can look up on the net.
2006-08-13 04:54:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You want to bomb your only allies in the area that are not Jewish? You bomb Mecca and you will have All of Arabia up in arms and that is where your army in Iraq is supplied from. how did you get so smart? I am impressed.
2006-08-11 20:01:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Arent you doing that already? Dimwit moron.
2006-08-11 18:57:04 · answer #6 · answered by savio 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋