English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I really don't think it should exist. The brits took land from already settled ppl and created chaos.

2006-08-11 18:42:38 · 20 answers · asked by doug 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

20 answers

No the Zionist state should have been somewhere else. I believe one of the possible locations was canada. No country wants to have part of it taken away and given to another group.

"his conflict isnt about Israel or where its located or where its borders are located. It has to do more with two fundamentally different cultures of people and one that sees fit to eliminate the other by force."

Very true, but if Israel wasn't there you would not have these two cultures in close proximity thus no fighting. The Palestinian movement is more about borders since they have be allocated a tiny **** hole devoid of resources.

2006-08-11 18:51:57 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin S 3 · 0 1

I dont think it was created rightfully. The british took a chunk of palestine and fed it to the jews. Now there creating such chaos that could have been prevented, Its discusting. Maybe one day israel will be blown to bits and we can all finally rest.

2006-08-11 18:44:46 · answer #2 · answered by unbeatablec 2 · 0 1

Actually I don't. I know they claim they owned the land... how many years ago but that time had passed and new settlers were there.

Btw, congratulations for knowing history. I have researched the creation of the UN from the League of Nations and the British were behind all of this.

2006-08-11 18:46:24 · answer #3 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 0

Israel was orginally supposed to be located in africa until the zionist movement occured.... Everyone deserves to have a country of there own but it shouldnt have been placed in an area that would compromise people that was already home to another race(the palestinian people)

2006-08-11 18:50:23 · answer #4 · answered by Helweh 2 · 0 0

It is an illegitimate child of U.S., & U.K. Parents and their illegitimate child, Israel have became threat to the world-peace and in fact they are the worst terrorist of the worldand now and then indulge in terrorists acts against their own people, such as 9/11 and alleged 'Terrorist Plot' and also creating terrorism across the world and spreading enemity and hatred among various religions and variousnations of the world.

In public opinion of the peace loving world along with illegitimate parents, viz., U.K. & U.S., theirillegitimate child Isreal should be removed from the globe.

2006-08-11 18:58:41 · answer #5 · answered by bharathghf 2 · 0 1

This conflict isnt about Israel or where its located or where its borders are located. It has to do more with two fundamentally different cultures of people and one that sees fit to eliminate the other by force.

2006-08-11 18:53:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

And where are you from? I believe that for first time in history when Israel become a state EVERYONE (atheist, Christians, Muslims and JEWS) was able to go and see all historical beauty. But their Jews and must be wrong.........

2006-08-11 18:51:06 · answer #7 · answered by shikk79 3 · 1 0

The Arabs invaded them the day they declared themselves a nation. That would be like sharing a coke with a five year old and him kicking you in the shin because he wanted it all.

2006-08-11 18:45:26 · answer #8 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 1 0

it was created just as rightfully as Palestine and Phoenecia was created...Jews were there before Islam was invented.

2006-08-11 18:48:57 · answer #9 · answered by R J 7 · 1 0

because the problem isn't that plot of land. If Israel become everywhere contained in the middle East, lets see an same reaction. ...that a minority contained in the middle East does no longer have the right to self-rule. The Kurds face the exact same problem & even hate rhetoric from Arab Muslims who experience this manner. at the same time as modern Muslims see it in yet otherwise (modernized), more than a number of Arab Muslims stuck with the Islamic idea that when conquered a land belonged to them & all of us else become dhimhis, subservient & latest separently in hardship-free words with the aid of paying a particular tax. quite contained in the middle East! upload to it is their experience of insult that colonizers occupied them, & some thing no longer Arab Muslim is considered as quite insulting & worth of the tremendous strive against. So, it become the Ottomans who owned it, that invited the Jews into to make stronger the realm, to hitch Jews already there. It become AFTER that that a minimum of seventy 5% of Arabs moved into the realm for the added effective jobs & opportunities. This view of "stolen" given now actually ability, in case you study their own web pages, that their selection to dominant the area & style a larger empire of administration, become stolen with the aid of the mere existent of Israel. with the aid of occupied, & i become bowled over to study this as I study Palestinian & Hizbollah speeches & web pages, ability Israel's mere exist -- no longer Israeli rules contained in the terroritories. information: At one aspect the Jews were presented a tiny city state round Tel Aviv, completely Jewish equipped out of sand dunes. The Jews very reluctantly agreed. It become the Arabs who refused even that. ================= Master_B you've were given it backwards. round 800,000 Jews were forcibly evicted from Arab lands & absorbed with the aid of Israel. in spite of the undeniable fact that, overwhelmingly very few Arabs noted a soldier previously operating, on the request of their own leaders (to assist you "push the Jews into the sea")!! they have been pawns ever considering of their own Arab brethern, taught to hate Israel particularly of given aspects & ideological & literal help with the aid of fellow Arab international places to construct their own futures.

2016-11-29 23:20:33 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers