2006-08-11 18:05:54 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
WRONG her husband should rot in h*ll where he deserves to be... She had a Mother and Father who loved her and wanted to take care of her. Just because he moved on and didn't want to be burdened with her doesn't give him the right to kill her!! He is a murderer and it sickens me to think he had the backing of our judicial system to do so... Inhumane and cruel...
2006-08-11 18:10:55 · answer #1 · answered by angela r 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
schiavo, i think. and i think it's horribly wrong!!!!!!!!!!!! the whole case was based on a quality of life issue, and terri had nothing in writing saying she didn't want a feeding tube as far as i can tell. that husband had NO idea if she was happy or not. just because she wasn't up and around like a lot of us doesn't mean she didn't have a life. i worked with a girl very similar to her and she had a great life. i think it's awful that after keeping her alive for years they starved the poor girl to death, just so that sorry excuse for a man didn't have to divorce an invalid and feel sorry for himself. that rotten bastard!
2006-08-11 18:10:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terry Schiavo had been basically brain dead for years. There was no reasonable hope for recovery. It was, therefore, appropriate to pull the plug. Certainly the most disgusting aspect of the entire episode was all the governmental meddling in what should have been a private decision.
2006-08-11 18:13:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tough, very tough.
Anyone who has had to watch a loved one fade away slowly by the dying process knows that the decision to end the pain, or the lifeless existence has to be in personal turmoil for the rest of their days.
Sure, each one of us can say she wouldn't want to exist this way, or that she still was cognizant of what was happening, or that her husband wanted to move on and he simply was allowed to kill her, but with as many of us who feel one way or another, not ONE OF US had to deal with the decision, or deal with the crap that ensued before and after her death.
We only know what the media reported, and we only can base our opinions on our belief systems we hold for ourselves. WE CAN NOT determine or possibly know what was happening behind closed doors, so to speak.
And as an abstract thought, who is to say that the events surrounding Terri death did not awaken something in all of us, something that we may learn from, something very positive for man as a whole. We can't, so I can only pray in my heart for every person and family out there who is faced with this terrifying and debilitating decision that God, in His infinite wisdom understands the weakness of man, and that he sheds his grace on those who are dying and those who are, in their very heart and soul are believing they are committing an act of love and kindness for those they love.
My heart broke for Terri's parents, my heart broke for Terri, and my heart broke for this country and for her husband. I believe with every fiber of my being that the "government" had no right to weigh in with ANY decision on this matter. While I DO NOT believe in abortion I equally BELIEVE that the government has no right to tell me what I can and can not do when it comes to matters of life or death. Don't go to extremes' here people, of course I am not refering to a cold blooded and senseless murder. Unless of course I am convicted for a crime and sentenced to death and then, well give me the needle, quick and painless
I pray for all of the Scheivo family. I personally know what they went through.
2006-08-12 19:34:48 · answer #4 · answered by jv1104 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe it's right to prolong the life of someone who was in such a state as she was, especially considering there's no way to reverse that condition. If it happened to someone in my family, I think it would be more painful to see them everyday and they not be able to communicate with me, hug me, or show me any type of affection. If they die, that would be painful, but that pain is a bit more temporary.
2006-08-11 18:10:43 · answer #5 · answered by Joy M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It shouldn't matter, its not America to decide if its wrong or right. Its only between the ex-husband and her family. Hence, no opinion.
2006-08-11 18:13:04 · answer #6 · answered by roverriffer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it was wrong that she was allowed to suffer for 15 years!
Who would want to see a loved one in that helpless state???
2006-08-11 18:26:09 · answer #7 · answered by iyamacog 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of it rather is superb suited. If he replaced into nonetheless captain, he'd be putting an damaging occasion to unquestionably everyone: you may sleep with your mate's gal and the international will nonetheless love you! John Terry finished a genuine EPIC FAIL there in my opinion. think of roughly his damaging spouse and teenagers (if he has teenagers). he's in simple terms ruined his kinfolk and broken their hearts. I dunno regardless of if or not they might desire to forgive him yet enable's in simple terms desire he learns his lesson.
2016-10-01 23:35:29 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
oh totally wrong!
she should have had a right to live...
not her stupid husband... that thought he had the right to do that... the day I found out,, I felt like everyone just gave up on her,, she could have had a chance!
2006-08-11 18:09:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that it was wrong. You should read the autopsy report on her, it is very interesting.
2006-08-11 18:09:09 · answer #10 · answered by beccajanez29 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋