Illegal Aliens Have CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?

Question

What About 2nd Amendment?
Should WE THE PEOPLE Submit
To ARMED ILLEGAL ALIENS In Our Neighborhoods??

Where Do WE THE PEOPLE Draw The Line
On The Mutilation Of The Constitution??

If The SMUGGLERs 4th Amendment Rights
Were Violated By Our Border Patrol Agents
Doesnt That IMPLY
That ILLEGAL ALIENS Have 2nd Amendment Rights??
The Right To Bear Arms?

Answer 1

With the exception of carrying weapons, illegal immigration is actually an invasion of a country.

Here IS a large block of people secretly crossing our border and moving surreptitiously into some community where they pretend to be a part of the community. By working at low paying wages and hiding from public notice by not paying taxes, they conceal their intent.

If we now say we should give them Constitutional Rights, we are saying that any block of fanatic Muslims who want to destroy America should have the protection of our Constitution while they go about bombing people and things.

THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO KILL US, OUR CONSTITUTION SAYS SO. BALONEY!!!

Answer 2

coragryph

Level 5



Yes. Because the majority of the Bill of Rights are not rights granted to citizens.

They are limitations on US government action. And that applies regardless of who the US government is acting against. The vast majority of protections afforded by the Constitution have nothing to do with citizenship. Try actually reading the Constitution some time.

Specifically, the 4th Amendment applies against all government searches and seizures where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. But the courts have already determined that there is no such expectation of privacy during a border search or arrest.

And the 2nd Amendment only applies to federal regulations of guns. It doesn't have any effect on state regulations. But that's beside the point because your example makes no sense. There is no direct interaction between the 2nd and 4th Amendments.

Answer 3

There are no constitutional rights for illegal aliens..But I know where you are going with this....>>>>>and coragryph---I have read the constitution..did you forget why it was written? Let me enlighten you for those of you who were either not taught or forgot all about this. Before the Declaration of Independence Congress directed states to devise new republican governments to replace the provincial Congress and committees that had met since 1774. Americans wanted to create tangible documents specifying the FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURES OF GOVERNMENT. The farmers of the state constitutions concerned themselves primarily with outlining the distribution of and limitation on GOVERNMENT POWER. Authority was improperly distributed amount the branches of government or not confined within reasonable limits, the states might become just what THEY FOUGHT AGAINST AND THEY WOULD OF HAD BRITAIN AGAIN.... let me say that again would of had BRITAIN AGAIN.....HUMM I guess I see something here...oh wait..........so all that effort and fighting was for the illegals rights..???? Americans had fears in the 1700's why is it so hard to see those same fears now?.... I believe that the rights are for the people by the people and what is meant by that by the people is just that by the people who are Legal to VOTE. not this sneaking vote either. GRRRRR

Answer 4

specific. by using fact the ordinary public of the invoice of Rights are actually not rights granted to electorate. they're obstacles on US government action. And that applies in spite of who the U. S. government is appearing against. the super majority of protections afforded with the aid of the form don't have something to do with citizenship. try somewhat analyzing the form it sluggish. noticeably, the 4th replace applies against all government searches and seizures the place there's a reasonable expectation of privateness. however the courts have already desperate that there is no such expectation of privateness in the time of a border seek or arrest. And the 2d replace in basic terms applies to federal policies of weapons. It would not have any consequence on state policies. yet that's beside the factor by using fact your occasion is mindless. there is no direct interplay between the 2d and 4th Amendments.

Answer 5

If they aren't a US citizen, they shouldn't have any rights in this country. Remember 911????? And I'm sick of the press 2 for english crap. Hello, what country are we in again, some people must of forgotten. We should not be allowed to accept illegal immigrants. Stay the hell home! We don't want you!

Answer 6

do you realize that to vote you had to be a land owner at one time and this was found to be illegal but not until the 19th century. I say this because we would have no illegal if we had no welfare.