English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know everyone is going to come out and say it's not moral to do so, but if that is your answer please back it up by offerring a better solution to stop this warfare on non-miltary targets. (There will always be terrorism to a certain degree, but it has not been the way it is now in the past). Do you even think we can get it under control or was 9/11 a pandoras box?

2006-08-11 16:27:53 · 39 answers · asked by Quest4questions 6 in News & Events Current Events

I agree that the media should back off of this a lot.

Terrorizing does not always have to involve killing. Terror is more psychological then anything else. Killing is the fastest and easiest way to bring this about.

Don't think for a second that are enemies aren't human, because they are.
.
For the people who say they don't want the violence to escalate, well it's too late for that. It's only going to get worse.

As far as the WWIII comment, well we are as closer to WWIII right now then ever before. In fact the only reason why we don't call this WWIII is because we are not fighting against Germany.

All they want to do now is something worse then 9/11 already was. The more time we give them, the more time they have to plan.

Oh, and I don't blame all of this on the Muslims. Christians, Jews, and Muslims are all equally responsible. However, the time for finger pointing is over. Let's find a solution so the historians of the future can decide who was wrong

2006-08-11 17:13:56 · update #1

39 answers

Bullies do not understand peace. You need to punch them to make them think about leaving you alone.

2006-08-11 16:35:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

We should never do the wrong thing. The ends do not always justify the means. To use terror to fight terror would merely cause an escalation in violence and would not be a solution. We should always do right even if we are wronged.

2006-08-11 16:31:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It doesn't work. It'd be like an "arms race" of viciousness...-the killing would only get more & MORE horrible. The best we'll EVER be able to do, is to keep our eyes open, diagnose the situation to try to keep it from getting any worse- and always keeping trying to improve the lot of the poor & disenfrancised peoples of the world. If EVERYBODY improved upon themselves, the world would become a better place. Nobody would have to lift a finger- to help anybody else.

2006-08-11 16:42:14 · answer #3 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 0 0

You are right about the moral arguement...two wrongs never make a right.

I think the approach that might work the best is to make the environment as unfriendly for terrorists as possible by limiting access to weapons, freeze assets, pressure countries that harbor them, and use human intelligence to infiltrate the organizations....pretty much what we are doing now.

I'd also work with media to limit exposure to terrorists acts - no pictures, no glory, no details...don't reward the freaks who likely live off the exposure or incite those with crazy ideas.

2006-08-11 16:32:52 · answer #4 · answered by dm_dragons 5 · 0 0

Muslims seek to eliminate all non-Muslims. It seems there are several choices.
- convert to Islam
- fight fire with fire
- admit defeat and pay jizyah
- have faith that UN diplomacy will solve the problem
- have faith that the messiah will come and solve the problem


The Pandora's box was the Iranian Revolution in 1979.

2006-08-11 17:26:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well two wrongs never make a right. Isn't war already a terror? Think about it if you were a civilian and you were with your whole family and fighting was going on around you. Wouldn't you be scared?

2006-08-11 16:32:29 · answer #6 · answered by mar 4 · 1 0

I don't care about 'moral' ;or not: : I just say, Blow the whole Middle East to Hell! just nuke em! They all want to die and get 41 virgins anyway! They don't respect life. They cherish death, so let's give it to them!! That's my opinion. I know it is wrong, but I still say "blow them to hell" What did the preisdent of Iran say? "I'll blow Israel off the map" Well, Israel is smaller than New Jersey, do you think any rational leader of a country would be conserned with blowing them off the map"? No.. The Muslims are insane!

2006-08-11 16:36:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

thats a little rediculous. we only went to iraq to get their oil anyways, not to fight terror.. and did everyone just let it slide that their were supposed to be weapons of mass destruction that we NEVER FOUND.. i mean, that was bush's whole reason for going to begin with. now many innocents have died on both sides. iraq is still just as crazy as before, we are losing billions and sinking even lower into debt, i mean we could be spending that money to help our own country, not fighting another.. to improve the world, you start with yourself.

2006-08-11 16:33:38 · answer #8 · answered by hey 3 · 1 0

I know I don't want to be a part of terrorizing anyone EXCEPT those bastards that terrorize us.But we do need to separate the good from the bad.I know I wouldn't want to be killed because my government made bad decisions.I don't even clump my kids together when it comes to bad behavior.

2006-08-11 16:33:20 · answer #9 · answered by kelliekareen 4 · 1 0

Wars should only be fought by us old guys..That way the countries that offer the best health care and respect for us old people would win. We wouldn't kill kids, we wouldn't loot or rape. Maybe a rousing game of checkers could solve it..

2006-08-11 16:31:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

These Air plane Terrorist should given their wish, fly them to about 10,000 feet and kicked them out of the plane with radio transmitters straped to them so we could hear how brave they were as the go down.

2006-08-11 17:03:46 · answer #11 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers