English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What about charles Darwin what do you think of his theories?

2006-08-11 16:26:40 · 5 answers · asked by Love Exists? 6 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

except they did prove it... thousands of skeletons have been found of moneky people with brians like humand and early human civilizations. Why cant people join science and god together? i mean why does it have to be either science or god?

2006-08-11 16:35:47 · update #1

every one who asnwerd this question please answer my other 2 question about this subject.thanks

2006-08-11 17:07:14 · update #2

5 answers

Simply put...
EGG+SPERM=
ZYGOTE>>>Embryo>>>FETUS>>>BABY
EVOLUTION!
Who created the EVOLUTION process?
Who knows???
IS really important?
The bible puts together some theories not facts!
Science has proved facts for centuries and have not proved anything in the BIBLE to be 100% truthful!
No religion has PROOF either it is faith based on people who do not believe facts...
Where is the PROOF that the WORD came from GOD?
That it was written by 12 men because someone named Jesus told them too?
PROOF???
AHA!
NONE
did not think so!
Move on....

2006-08-11 16:41:32 · answer #1 · answered by Samuella SilverSelene 3 · 0 0

I believe in evolution to an extent. I don't go with Darwin's theory, and it is only theory, not fact. I do think maybe the human could have looked a little more cavish, but I don't think we came from Apes. Besides, why would there still be Apes then? I do believe that animal forms changed over the years, but a crocodile with huge teeth and twice as big as today's croc, is still a croc. The age of the earth, well, God's time is not the same as earthly time. So, until the fourth day, when God created time as we know it, what was a day to God could have been 1000 years or more. Those are just a few of my thoughts. Having said that, I do also believe that the Bible is truth and literal in its context.

Genesis 1
14 And God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark seasons and days and years, 15 and let them be lights in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth." And it was so. 16 God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. 17 God set them in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth, 18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fourth day.

2006-08-12 00:25:45 · answer #2 · answered by Gardener for God(dmd) 7 · 0 1

Nope, for two reasons. It is a scientific THEORY - one which has not been able to be prove, and is based on faulty assumptions. For example, genetic mutations cause a decrease in genetic information, not an increase, and evolution theorizes that through mutations more advanced life comes forth, rather than the opposite, which CAN be seen. And the second reason is, I believe the Bible in a literal way.

2006-08-11 23:32:14 · answer #3 · answered by Strange question... 4 · 0 2

Yep, most intelligent people acknowledge it as a strong possibility and probably the closest thing to the truth we have so far. Most people who would deny it are just bigoted by their beliefs or just don't know enough on the subject. Most, not all.

2006-08-11 23:59:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, because of my religious beliefs.

To explain evolution....everything that exist today has to be proved to have been something else. If Man evolved from Apes, what did plant evolve from? Did all insects, trees, water evolve? Or is it that only Humans evolved? What ever these things evolved from ---someone had to create the first thing that ever existed.

Or was it a sonic boom and everything appeared? If so, look at WHO was behind the sonic boom.

2006-08-11 23:43:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers