You have a B.Sc. degree, and your monthly salary is 5000 ID, 1 kilo of meat/chicken costs at least 1500 ID, a can of soda 1000 ID, a piece of s*it old car for a million ID, a small moderate house for around 15 million ID and you must pay lump sum, There's no such thing as finance in Iraq!! In the summer the temp. easily reaches 50c=120f and you can't use a fan or A/C (a new A/C unit was sold for 2 million ID in the nineties!!)due to the daily blackout especially in hottest time of the year! That was the typical life the vast majority of Iraqi people had to endure under the tyranny of Saddam.
Despite the unrest now the situation is improving steadily and the purchasing power has improved significantly especially for the graduated and intellectual Iraqis, Just take a moment and imagine what a horrible life we had and don't say America did wrong by going to Iraq, Regardless of the WMD excuse!
ID: Iraqi Dinar
2006-08-11 16:23:12 · 15 answers · asked by bikake 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We need to ask this question to the Iraqi people. They are the ones affected by this the most. Were they better off with Saddam?
2006-08-11 16:27:03 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don’t think America did wrong by going to Iraq… I know they did! Australia did wrong by going there with them. Righting that wrong is going to be one hell of a job, and it’s going to take the rest of the international community to fix it! The first step needed is for the coalition forces to get the hell out of Iraq, before things get a damn side worse! Whilst the damage isn’t yet irreparable, the longer the coalition forces remain in Iraq, the more likely it is for the situation to turn into an utter catastrophe! We promised we were going to help the Iraqi people. With their country now on the brink of a civil war, perhaps the best thing we can do to help them now is to leave, and hope that the rest of the international community can step in and clean up the mess we helped to create!
2006-08-12 05:12:06 · answer #2 · answered by I_C_Y_U_R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
alright but it was none of our business to go over there and since you come of so pro war what about this for ya!
Where is bin laden? that was really how all of this got into play!
Now tell me what do yin got to do with yang!
and speaking on living conditions I know America cannot free no one from horrible living conditions when slavery was horrible and who is American to help someone out of there bad condition when they are the ones whom showed the world just how to do this to others
that why i cant believe American hasn't paid for the slavery they put the blacks in and felt Hitler was such a bad evil creature how is it we haven't looked here at out history and repented to those right here that has been done wrong
i am not going over sees when there needs to be issues confronted right her e
and with all the money spent on war we could have gotten our 40 acres and a mule !
2006-08-11 16:31:33 · answer #3 · answered by wise 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither area substitute into stunning. i'm assuming your question refers to events formerly the 1st Abrams tanks headed in direction of Bagdad. Saddam concept he might desire to bluff his had on WMD. He miscalculated the finished subject. The Iraqi military made no attempt to prepare for conflict, they did no longer ruin any bridges, blow up any of the dams alongside the Tigris and Euphrates, and not one unit moved in to any sort of shielding posture. u . s . of america under the recommend from the incompatent Secratary of protection because Mcnmara laughed at primary Shinseki on how many troops could be mandatory. This led to no longer adequate troops to guard Iraq after the march to Bagdad, and it substitute into the blunder that makes Rumsfield the hero of the insurgency. That coupled with that fool Bremer who desperate to disband the Iraqi military extremely than positioned them to artwork for us added made a multitude for the U. S. in Iraq. regrettably Bush is doing stunning by applying keeping u . s . of america in Iraq. Iraq at present is the suited occasion of two wrongs do no longer make a stunning. As super of a strategic mistake it substitute into to circulate in it would be a sheer strategic disaster to leave stunning now.
2016-11-04 10:09:34 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the Iraqi people have a long way to go . I don't think their form of Democracy will be like ours, but hopefully they will actually be able to participate in the new style of government.
2006-08-11 16:33:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-08-11 19:21:24 · answer #6 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you trying to cover up for bush mistake he lied two both houses of congress,to the people of the united state,yes Saddam was no good but so is Iran,North Korea,china Cuba half of the south American country it not our affair to control the world
2006-08-11 16:30:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why start a war and not want to win? that has been the us govt idea since ww2 ended. send in a few troops, let the corporations charge as much as they can, get a bunch of poor kids killed, pay more for equipment that is junk, let more troops die, give medals to officers for incompetance, get more troops killed, and finally, after making corporations even richer than sh*t, get more troops killed, and get out with honor, like they did in 'nam. and don't fight to win, that would stop the fun.
2006-08-11 16:31:47 · answer #8 · answered by de bossy one 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq is in the middle of a civil war with Us troops in the middle of sectarian violence, since Iraq has their own police force, why should American soldiers stay and get blown up,, there not peacekeepers, there not contractors, their soldiers,,,,,
2006-08-11 17:45:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i've chatted with an iraqi before. he's happy that sadam's gone. but he didn't want americans to stay in their land for too long either.
2006-08-11 16:35:53 · answer #10 · answered by ice 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋