As sad as this is I am in a bad situation. I have Ron Dayne, Tatum Bell and Mike Bell. I know this sucks. Originally I had Tatum and Ron. I was waiting to see who starts and then trade the one that did not start. Since Mike Bell was named the starter I picked him up off waivers. Now I have too many RB's from one team. Who should I get rid of?
2006-08-11 15:28:09 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Hold onto them till the season starts.. then you can possibly get a read on how Shanahan will be using the RB's, and make a decision from there.
I know it's not the best answer, but with his famous RB by committee, and a stranger off the street mentality, there isn't much else you can do.
2006-08-11 15:31:37 · answer #1 · answered by rychendroll 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, according to the depth chart, rookie Mike Bell is at the top of the chart, while Tatum Bell is at #2 and Dayne at #3. This is going to be a close situation that's going to last until pre-season ends with a clear defenitive winner. Mike Anderson won the job and rejuvinated his career last season, so one of the three could win the job. This is just another ploy by Shannahan to motivate his RB to step up, although Bell (Mike, not Tatum) has impress in camp and starting to get comfortable with Denver blocking scheme so he knows where to run. Like last season, Tatum was a top-50 because of potential but eventually split time with Anderson to finish with 900+ yards because of his inability to get short runs. This year, he's at the top 50 because his only competition was Ron Dayne and Cedric Cobbs, yet he struggling with short runs again, prompting to promote the other Bell on top. Dayne was the original starter but Shannahan like him more as a third-down back than giving him the job outright. So, in conclusion, I would give up Dayne, since he's far away from winning the starting job if he drops from #1 to #3 in the depth chart.
2006-08-11 20:04:22 · answer #2 · answered by mojo8983 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It'll be Mike Bell and Ron Dayne sharing time. Don't be surprised if Tatum Bell is traded (really soon). My guess is the Jets, but I hear there are about 4 teams interested.
2006-08-11 16:09:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dayne
2006-08-11 15:32:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
reliable question! contained in the early going, i imagine Mike Bell will be tremendous. he receives 20 contains to Tatum's 15. because the season wears on, i'd not be supried to work out Tatum Bell take over the initiating slot, yet he will under no circumstances get a 30 carry Terrell Davis style of load. it is going to continuously be a platoon, except they commerce for someone, say Thomas Jones. Tinker Bell could run for a million,000 at the back of their hogs, yet you want both honestly one of them. i replaced into in a position to play both Mike Anderson and T. Bell very last 3 hundred and sixty 5 days contained in the Rb and flex positions hostile to crummy communities. once you should confirm on, stay with Tatum. per chance he receives traded, who's prevalent with.
2016-11-24 21:03:56 · answer #5 · answered by freije 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
from my point of veiw i would get rid of mike, im pretty sure ron and tatum will have a good season.
2006-08-11 15:33:54 · answer #6 · answered by Etak 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dayne is trash, well they all are but hes the biggest pile of trash out of all of them
2006-08-11 17:46:56 · answer #7 · answered by jim_shoe31 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'll hold on to them until it is a definite then trade for some needed bench help.
2006-08-11 18:13:08 · answer #8 · answered by Rusty Shackleford 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋