lust. love is a powerful word, and i don't think you can just fall in love with someone and be willing to give up everything for them just by looking at them for the first time.
2006-08-11 14:38:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by GC 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I WANT to believe in love at first sight...but I just really dont know. I think it would be better to call it lust.
2006-08-11 14:43:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by martster38 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe in lust at first sight. Love is a much deeper connection. Love involves all levels of emotion, not just the physical.
2006-08-11 14:42:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by toni 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you can love someone at first sight and it could just be lust, but true love takes time.
2006-08-11 14:45:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by lak3rat 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe in love at first sight but many people mistake lust for love. Which can trun out tragic in the end... quite sad.
2006-08-11 14:41:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Keebler 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
lust at first sight of course. people see the body first then the mind
2006-08-11 14:39:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by putrapembelakebenaran 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, it's lust all right. My husband used to always say he fell in love with me at first sight, but he never forgot to mention I wasn't wearing a bra at the time.
I don't think he was in love with "the girls"--he just wanted to touch them. Love came later.
2006-08-11 14:41:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by homebuyer 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
lust at first sight. I am a man after all lol
2006-08-11 14:38:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by mick987g 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
more like lust at first sight
2006-08-11 14:38:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by duc602 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it is lust if it is only about the looks but if you automaticly have a connection then it could possibly be love ,but..... then you would have to talk to them and i guess then its not at first sight.
2006-08-11 14:50:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe in love at first sight..
2006-08-11 14:38:30
·
answer #11
·
answered by Justine 3
·
0⤊
0⤋