he's terrible....he discriminates.....he doesn't like blacks, puerto ricans, poor people, arabs, gay people...all that's left are rich republicans who don't have to work a day in their lives and rednecks that are too inbred to stand up
he wastes money and lives in iraq and stays longer than he should...he raises the national debt like he doesn't care....same with gas prices...and he makes the whole world hate the USA....
he doesn't care what other people want....he just cares about himself....he can't even complete a sentence let alone a speech..he's a disgrace to the office
2006-08-16 06:05:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yogaflame 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Bush is a politician and like all politicians is owned by big business. I'd have to say I'm pro Bush where terrorism is concerned but con with his immigration policies. I'm also pro Bush with the war in Iraq, only because I can't imagine pulling out and leaving Iraq to Iran. But we need a new and better plan to fight the war. I'm also pro Bush where the economy is concerned. I'm for anyone that cuts taxes,and I really don't think people are doing any worse than they ever have. I just don't understand all the Bush bashing. He might not be the best president we've ever had, but he's sure far from being the worst.
2006-08-16 16:21:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by sagerider 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Bush wouldn't have had an identity if it wasn't for 9/11. He had to cut taxes to get the economy running again. Bill was lucky to have the .com happen on his watch. He did nothing to enable or create future wealth. Bush on the other hand was unfortunate to take over just after the .com crash. 911 further hit the economy.
Bush and the Dems have both been told what it will take to change the economics of Renewable Energy & both have ignored the information.
Fienstein patted herself on the back for doing exactly what I said would only cause our energy bill to skyrocket. Her readers most not look at the email they get. They wouldn't have answered it the way the did the many times I wrote her.
Expect the economy of 1850 by the year 2050 if we don't discover an economical way to replace the dwindling supply of fossil fuels.
2006-08-18 17:08:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by viablerenewables 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not pro Bush, nor do I see how anyone could be. But I wasn't pro Clinton either. I am sick to death of foreign policy costing us so much from the treasury and so much in young lives. I am sick to death of being lied too. Lets see, Bush lied his way into office in 2000, then he lied about 911, they lied about Afghanistan, Iraq, and they lied about Katrina. They lied about no child left behind, they lied about the prescription drug benefit for the elderly. If you had a family member or a friend or even a neighbor who told such outrageous lies, I do not believe you would trust him with your bankcard. And I know you would not turn him loose on your community with weapons of mass destruction. Yet that is exactly what we allowed to occur with George W. Bush. To criticize him is to be unpatriotic and everyone believes you support the terrorist. I believe that 911 should have been investigated before the first bomb was dropped and before the first shot was fired, I would not want to condem and innoncent man, nor would I want to condemn a nation that was not responsible. The speed we went to war with, the absence of a criminal investigation, is not how we are suppose to do things in this country. Our consitution declares a persons innoncence until proven guilty in a court of law. Everyone is suppose to have the right to face their accuser. Somehow those principles are all the more important when your talking about invading another nation, who lacks the weapons or military in which you could even declare it a fair fight. Seems to me the Bush Adminstration had this war planned before 911 ever occurred. Seems to me in the writings of The New American Century, they describe needing a new pearl harbor type of event to rapidly progress their agenda. Seems to me congress has rubberstamped every thing this man wanted. Seems to me we are worse off than we were. Seems to me they will be needing another excuse to invade Iran. Seems to me the people of this country should have been outraged in the 50's when we overthrew Iran's government and let the citizens of Iran be tortured for our foreign policies. It is not just George W. Bush that I am discusted with, It is our entire foreign policy being directed by Isreal, and when did Isreal become a state, and why do they have lobbyist in Washington petitioning our elected officials to carry out their policies? Why?
2006-08-16 08:08:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by barbara o 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
While President Bush isn't perfect, he's been a good president. A good indication of that is his doing what he knows is right regardless of the political implications. Did you ever wonder why we haven't had any more terrorist attacks in the USA? It is certainly because of all the unpopular measures the president and his administration have taken to prevent them. In addition, he stands up for the rights of unborn children and traditional marriage and he proclaims Jesus Christ as King.
2006-08-11 13:28:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by harrison 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
All con, no pro, he has conned some of the American people into thinking that he is someone other then the failure that he is. How they could vote for a coke snorting, alcoholic is beyond me. What is worse is some people still support him after all the bad decisions that he has made for America.
2006-08-11 13:20:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
History will see him as one of, if not the, most inept political
leader the United States has ever seen.
Generally, we accept as fact that Nixon was doing obviously
unconstitutional things (certainly illegal things), so he pretty
much keeps his ranking as the worst President of my life time,
but Bush is really trying hard to be number 2. If we find out
that he really is doing things quid-pro-quo for the energy
industry, his corruption will take him to number 1.
2006-08-11 13:18:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Elana 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Pro Bush and Leiberman:two men who stand by their convictions and ignore the ravings of the left.
2006-08-18 10:01:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by bigheadedb rat 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Thank God for Bush!Imagine what life would be like post 9/11 with the democrats in office.Most of the terror plots that have been foiled would not have.As he said,we need to give the proper people the proper resources to keep us safe.
2006-08-16 16:45:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by defender163 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
CON, he sucks. He's ignorant and what makes people think that he knows anything about foreign policy? Most people dont trust politicians as a rule, so why all of a sudden do we follow him blindly off to war, like all of a sudden his IQ went up? People are mostly sheep anyway, thank God there are a few of us left who think for ourselves. I cannot listen to any of his views on education, he's racist and a psuedo Christain to boot.
2006-08-17 09:20:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush will be judged by history, his peers, his creator, his enemies, etc....I will not judge him except to say, he was the better man over the opposition and is a better man than his predecessor. I have great empathy for the Presidents, not one of them survives without judgment and condemnation.
2006-08-18 16:16:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋