At Heathrow airport.
Go big Red Go
2006-08-11 12:11:43 · 23 answers · asked by 43 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
****yawnnnnn****
2006-08-11 12:27:47 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because then they would have to admit the Patriot Act was a good thing.
The NSA passed much information to the Brits.
The liberal MSM and the rest of their ilk can't stand seeing anything Bush does as good or right.
I mean look at Reuters (and others in the MSM) and their whole Fauxtography. They are nothing but an instrument of terrorist propaganda. They have become terrorism's 5th legion here in the U.S.
The liberal MSM believe they have the RIGHT to know what's going on in the inner workings of the government. They believe it is their right to shape American thinking and beliefs. They can't simply "report the news" - they are now *making* the news by creating it.
It speaks volumes when there are more media reps at a protest then actual protesters but you won't hear the media talk about that. After all, it doesn't fit their agenda.
2006-08-11 12:21:41 · answer #2 · answered by no one 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh shut up. Both sides of the media ignore things that make their side look bad. DUH
What do you think you're trying to prove? Fox News doesn't show every bad thing he does, just like Air America doesn't talk about every good hting he does.
Grow up and realize that media is biased sometimes both ways and sitting in a forum complaining isn't going to do anything.
Besides... He stopped coke bottle bombers but not 9/11. I don't forgive him for the way he handled 9/11 and any small "coke bottle bombers" being stopped won't make up for all of the other things I don't like about him.
Sure, I wish there was a media that was completely centrist. THe problem is that if you're far liberal.. everything looks too conservative.. if you're too conservative.. everything looks liberal.
Go make your own news channel if it bothers you that much. You can report about bombs in soda bottles all day!
2006-08-11 12:17:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
While I would be reluctant to say Pres Bush stopped the plot, the American Intelligence did have a part in it. They gave the info to the British. And part of that info was surveillance of money transactions and communications. Wonder how many people think that surveillance is a bad thing, now?
2006-08-11 12:43:41 · answer #4 · answered by robling_dwrdesign 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
get a clue, you have none now. the media is owned by Conservatives not Liberals. You should ask them. Anyone who is well informed would already know this as fact.
BTW, give credit where it's due. The President has nothing to do with Homeland Security other than tryiing to cut funding behind Americas backs.
This story was not in the Conservative bias media,
WASHINGTON - While the British terror suspects were hatching their plot, the Bush administration was quietly seeking permission to divert $6 million that was supposed to be spent this year developing new homeland explosives detection technology.
2006-08-11 12:24:28 · answer #5 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The drive-by media wouldn't say our President was good at anything you know this. They are a bunch of idiots!
2006-08-11 13:11:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The liberals and their media are all about negativity. They don't want you to know that we're winning the war on terror.
They want you to feel gloomy and like we're at rock bottom
Republicans take the offensive to terrorism, they go after it.
Democrats take the defensive and just try to limit it.
.
2006-08-11 12:16:22 · answer #7 · answered by John 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
why did i have this dream that weeks/months later it was revealed that there was no terrorist plot at all. it was a huge SCAM to make the current administration look good. come to find out they had just found some teens on-line talking about something like a terrorist plot, but no real desire to carry any of it out, but the public was made to think that there was a real threat. must admit, everybody got freaked out when GB2 was talking about raising the "threat level" to RED, i'll be waiting to see what these next few weeks/months will reveal
2006-08-11 12:24:05 · answer #8 · answered by baybeegrl5 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
He actually thanked Tony Blair for stopping them- so that makes two people who weren't there. If Blair and Bush had actually been responsible for stopping the bombers, then they would have got through.
2006-08-11 12:19:56 · answer #9 · answered by Mesper 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Coke bottle what? Bush stop the who now.
2006-08-11 12:17:09 · answer #10 · answered by The Guy 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
.All these answers (and the question) and nobody can provide a link to a credible news story (or even Fox News, for that matter). Lay off the red Cool-Ade.
Last I heard, Bush was on vacation, cutting brush, while his war rages on...
2006-08-11 12:25:43 · answer #11 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋