Totally...
2006-08-11 11:58:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
absolutely no longer. youthful children have a tremendous variety of questions and it is complicated to discover the solutions to them. yahoo solutions is the perfect position for them to ask and get carry of solutions to difficult questions. there is not any proxy i comprehend of that lets children answer a question and get insightful archives and reviews like yahoo solutions does. as well, i do no longer see a difficulty with children being waiting to respond to questions or see different questions human beings ask. they could imagine and percentage what they comprehend to help the guy asking the question and seeing different questions human beings ask is nice because they could have puzzled about that too and they could now discover out the answer to it. I also do no longer see too a lot human being content textile or vulgar language like you've defined. as well, if someone below 18 become in this website and did not like what they noted, they could purely no longer come back to this website. in spite of the undeniable fact that, i do no longer see too a lot of that. This an outstanding website for human beings 13 and up and to eliminate the oppurtunity to study and answer/ask questions purely because they don't seem 18 must be incorrect and judgemental. Why ought to anybody favor someone to eliminate an outstanding website it is suitable for youths and adults purely because there must be some human being content textile? children might want to be mature sufficient to study over that and seem for the solutions they are looking for for for. as well, in a talk board like this, issues are under no circumstances ideal and theres continually going to be some inappropriate issues and that is purely what you ought to come throughout at the same time as asking a question and expecting solutions. children are prepared to take that probability. All they prefer is to question and answer and that is strictly what they could do the following. ideal for children that are all curious. So, no i do no longer imagine the minimum age might want to be 18. by no ability. it is completely wonderful the way it is.
2016-11-29 22:51:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2006-08-15 09:08:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Calvin of China, PhD 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
TOtally
2006-08-11 12:04:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by pumpkinism 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so, because most of the adults act like children. But I do believe there should be age restrictions because of some of things said on here. And maybe the adults would have a little more freedom of what they can say.
2006-08-11 12:01:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by sisinlovewithyou 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The questions would be less inane i suppose.
But then it would take away 90% of the math questions (i.e., kids asking for their homework done)
It would also make the answers easier to read since there wouldnt be 100 'i dont knows' or 'i thinks'
2006-08-11 12:01:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Without a doubt, many "immature" questions come from adults, but weeding out the kids would certainly make a difference.
2006-08-11 12:59:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by emmadropit 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no they should be allowed but their parent should have to give their social security number to acess certain parts of the site so they know what there child is reading,seeing,etc
but im 12 and im mature
2006-08-11 12:04:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-08-11 12:10:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by crazi8red 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-08-11 12:00:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋