2006-08-11 10:56:58 · 17 answers · asked by tartan g 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
do any of those knobs "deserve" anything?
2006-08-11 10:59:47 · answer #1 · answered by binksiesbaby 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Gar to a certain extent, but even if Pete don't win, i believe that we will definately here more of Pete then the housemate that wins Big Brother.
But i back PETE all the way, i also think that if Pete don't win then Glyn could win, but i also think that Nikki will win and if she does then i think that it wouldn't be fair on the other housemates that has been in the house from the start.
2006-08-12 23:59:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont Think Pete deserves to win. He is not a strong enough character and a lot of the events that occur in the house Pete remains firmly in the background. Pete has done a lot for the cause for Toutettes Syndrome and hopefully now anyone with the disease is better understood and sympathetic to them than previously thought by the public. It certainly has on my account. But unfortunately Pete has allowed himself to be easily manipulated by others in the house. Lea and especially Aislyene certainly and to a an extent Nikki. Aislyene tried sleeping in the same bed as him just to get back at Nikki. Pete has been blind to this and has not spoken up for himself enough. It reminds me of last years winner Anthony Hutton who was manipulated by Craig and at times was very quiet and what has happened to him now hes fallen off the radar already.
I say Glynn to win he has the same appealing heart of gold as Pete but his personality is bigger and stronger and can hold his own opinion and arguenents without backing down.
Glynn to win this year I say......................
2006-08-11 11:47:34 · answer #3 · answered by Gar 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The tragedy of Big Brother is that somebody actually gets to win it. In reality, there's a whole group of us out here in TV Licence paying land who loathe and detest all forms of reality TV, and want the production companies to stop rewarding people for taking part in them. Personally, on the last vote, there should be a third option, where you can ring in and vote for "no suitable candidate" so that none of the contestants win anything because they're all so tedious that they'd didn't deserve their fifteen minutes of fame in the first place. They got free food and board, what more do they want? Our gratitude? Nah. Not gonna happen.
2006-08-11 13:23:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think anyone deserves to win any kind of reality game. All of them are based in psychological manipulation and decite. They are one of the many things wrong with society and they flaunt it.
2006-08-11 11:02:50 · answer #5 · answered by DEATH 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've suddenly become greedy as I don't watch it, so I don't know. But it's worth two points to me, and lets the enquirer know more about the following of big brother. I don't agree with these programmes as they encourage us to be too judgemental of our fellow humans.
2006-08-11 11:02:28 · answer #6 · answered by filmwatcher59 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think of he's probable nonetheless odds on fav to win, yet extremely i do no longer think of he has achieved too plenty interior the dwelling house to warrant such favouratism aside needless to say that he's an exceptionally intense high quality guy.
2016-11-04 09:45:33 · answer #7 · answered by basinger 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whether he deserves to or not, he will win.
Its been a forgone conclusion since the first week.
2006-08-11 11:04:04 · answer #8 · answered by Peakey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would prefer glynn but pete second fav
2006-08-11 11:02:38 · answer #9 · answered by ♥fluffykins_69♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Me!! Ive already voted, he better win cost me a quid!!!!
2006-08-11 11:14:25 · answer #10 · answered by chickL 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who is pete
2006-08-11 11:00:09 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋