And to continue to support him,adore him,whorship him? Are they so self-centered they cant see that the republicans are a party that is being used by the super rich for the super rich?How do they continue to rely on FOX,Limbaugh,Oreily....and still feel that they are sane and reasonable?How far are their heads up their ***,s?
2006-08-11 10:11:54 · 15 answers · asked by tough as hell 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
sacolunga,.what i would like is for you to take your head out of your ***
2006-08-11 10:28:49 · update #1
Chris S.yet another one of your countless retarded replies
2006-08-11 10:29:55 · update #2
Chris S.yet another one of your countless retarded replies
2006-08-11 10:30:40 · update #3
vickit447 I have talked with idiots like you before why would I need to again.your politicaly retarded ...face it
2006-08-11 10:32:51 · update #4
HendryDoso..
at least keery wife knows that with being rich comes responsibilities ...so she switched partys and became a Democrat...Oh I seen your history of answers....you are a idiot too!
2006-08-11 10:51:40 · update #5
Because they never learned the value of integrity and dignity. They will sink with their "leader" and burn in hell with him.
2006-08-11 10:14:52 · answer #1 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
All i'm able to assert as an Aussie is as much as human beings have been over John Howard, he did a much extra suited interest in Australia in terms of Finance and protection, even after the mess ups that have affected Australia than George Bush did. I heard in the process the marketing campaign between George Bush and John Kerry, the place we've been balloting for the two John Howard or Kim Beasley, that George Bush pronounced that if Kim Beasley gained he could destroy the binds with Australia and we could now not be an best pal. that's pitiful, regardless of if it rather is not actual. John Howard replaced into nonetheless top Minister on the time. Oh and with the aid of the way it rather is obligatory to vote in Australia while you're 18 or over, in case you do not you get fined.
2016-10-01 23:11:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they are...and more so they are guilty of being naieve. there is a website listed below. click on the links within the story about the Bush - Moon connection. Read carefully and try to follow everything up or you will be just as guilty as them..This kind of thing could bring the Republican Party down to it's knees and the press is afraid to touch it...Please read...
www.thunderingsofthequill.com
2006-08-11 10:21:50 · answer #3 · answered by odysseus96 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How did you become so brilliant? Who taught you? What is Bush guilty of and what should I feel guilty of for voting for him? It's you lame airheaded idiots that think we don't have any enemy that wants to convert us to Islam or be killed. If Bush is guilty of being strong on terrorism, then by God I'm guilty too! Do you happen to know that the TSA wiretapping, etc. is part of what uncovered this plot to blow up THOUSANDS of Americans and Britons in midair? Oh, I guess you wouldn't know about such things. You think you're so brilliant and profound. I'm just glad we don't have a wuss in the White House right now. I'm GLAD we have a President who is STRONG on Islamic terrorists. I guess you want a President who will kiss the Islamic terrorists a$$e$. Is that what would make you happy? Yeah, YOU probably kiss their a$$e$!
2006-08-11 10:20:45 · answer #4 · answered by sacolunga 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know ask the 48% of Democrats that voted for Lieberman in the Connecticut Democratic primary, since Lieberman supports the war and Bush. mmmmm.......
Oh and I suppose no Democrats own stock in oil companies or any big business and they are all poor, yeah the rich guy class envy crap does not work when your heros are just as guilty as the people you are throwing out.
odysseus96 - wow who does your taxes, bigfoot? I thought Bush hated all minorities because he's a Republican, as well as being a ultra-Christian
That's so rediculous it's humerous!
2006-08-11 10:15:59 · answer #5 · answered by jasonzbtzl 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well, we rich people have to stick together...HA HA Your ignorance is very amusing. By the way, Chris S is right, but you are just to arrogant to admit you're wrong. That's the problem with America today...DEMOCRATS!!! And to comment on another question you had, your brother VOLUNTEERED to go to Iraq, President Bush didn't make him go. You democrats like to forget that detail. Where do you get your statistics from??CNN???
2006-08-11 10:57:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Is it possible to support a president without "adoring him, whorshiping him"?
Are these people any less sane then the ones who hate Bush with a passion and blame him for everything without reason?
The same could be said of those who supported Clinton through his countless errors.
2006-08-11 10:17:25 · answer #7 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Guilty of keeping buffoons like you out of power. Does the Heinz fortune qualify as super rich?
2006-08-11 10:47:13 · answer #8 · answered by HendryDoso 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Guilty?
Just because we don't want our money stolen from us from the government at the point of a gun, it doesn't mean that we are pawns for the "super rich." Quit trying to take money from the rich to distribute it to others.
2006-08-11 10:21:28 · answer #9 · answered by stevis78 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Guilty of what exactly?
You could ask a similar question of the residents of New Orleans. When Katrina washed their city away, Mayor Nagin did practically nothing for them, yet they reelected him. Does that make them equally culpable for their own situation? Oh wait, I forgot - that was Bush's fault too, wasn't it?
Nice. Can't refute the logic, so just call it retarded. I humbly bow to your superior intellect. (end sarcasm)
2006-08-11 10:20:47 · answer #10 · answered by Chris S 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Wow, you are so uninformed. I would love to get into a political discussion with you, but I'm quite sure you wouldn't have anything intelligent to say.
2006-08-11 10:26:16 · answer #11 · answered by vickit447 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋