Do you think Muslim Fanatics are the new "nazism">>?

Question

Iran is the "heart" of evil (muslim extremists) in the mideast, they are supporting hezbollah in their ideology The Iranian president wants Isreal to be "wiped off the map"> With this in mind, Do you think that Iran and the muslim fanatics will eventually cause a ww3, like Hitler and the nazis caused ww2??

Answer 1

Iran is a bit on the fanatic side I must admit. But the main country to fault for this is the US. Considering that America paid and armed Iraq to fight Iran in the 80s, it is totally understandable that Iran hates America.

As for Iran wanting to wipe out Israel, I do not agree with that but can see where Iran is coming from. Israel has occupied and still occupies Arab lands. It kills Palestinians on a daily basis(most of whom are civilians and not terrorists). Israel has defied 50+ UN security council resolutions. Israel still has 10000 Palestinian and Arab prisoners most of whom are held without a trail and only because they resisted the Internationally illegal occupation of the parts of the west bank and Gaza strip.

To better understand the "conflict" in the middle east, check the following link:

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html

I will quote some parts from it just in case you do not trust the link:

"Israel is often portrayed as David confronted by Goliath, but the converse is closer to the truth. Contrary to popular belief, the Zionists had larger, better equipped and better led forces during the 1947-49 War of Independence, and the Israel Defence Forces won quick and easy victories against Egypt in 1956 and against Egypt, Jordan and Syria in 1967 – all of this before large-scale US aid began flowing. Today, Israel is the strongest military power in the Middle East. Its conventional forces are far superior to those of its neighbors and it is the only state in the region with nuclear weapons. Egypt and Jordan have signed peace treaties with it, and Saudi Arabia has offered to do so. Syria has lost its Soviet patron, Iraq has been devastated by three disastrous wars and Iran is hundreds of miles away. The Palestinians barely have an effective police force, let alone an army that could pose a threat to Israel. According to a 2005 assessment by Tel Aviv University’s Jaffee Centre for Strategic Studies, ‘the strategic balance decidedly favours Israel, which has continued to widen the qualitative gap between its own military capability and deterrence powers and those of its neighbours.’ If backing the underdog were a compelling motive, the United States would be supporting Israel’s opponents."

And also

"During the first intifada, the IDF distributed truncheons to its troops and encouraged them to break the bones of Palestinian protesters. The Swedish branch of Save the Children estimated that ‘23,600 to 29,900 children required medical treatment for their beating injuries in the first two years of the intifada.’ Nearly a third of them were aged ten or under. The response to the second intifada has been even more violent, leading Ha’aretz to declare that ‘the IDF . . . is turning into a killing machine whose efficiency is awe-inspiring, yet shocking.’ The IDF fired one million bullets in the first days of the uprising. Since then, for every Israeli lost, Israel has killed 3.4 Palestinians, the majority of whom have been innocent bystanders; the ratio of Palestinian to Israeli children killed is even higher (5.7:1). It is also worth bearing in mind that the Zionists relied on terrorist bombs to drive the British from Palestine, and that Yitzhak Shamir, once a terrorist and later prime minister, declared that ‘neither Jewish ethics nor Jewish tradition can disqualify terrorism as a means of combat."

"One might argue that Israel and the Lobby have not had much influence on policy towards Iran, because the US has its own reasons for keeping Iran from going nuclear. There is some truth in this, but Iran’s nuclear ambitions do not pose a direct threat to the US. If Washington could live with a nuclear Soviet Union, a nuclear China or even a nuclear North Korea, it can live with a nuclear Iran. And that is why the Lobby must keep up constant pressure on politicians to confront Tehran. Iran and the US would hardly be allies if the Lobby did not exist, but US policy would be more temperate and preventive war would not be a serious option."

Also check the website for human rights watch and Amnesty International.

Answer 2

Idealistically the are exactly the same. Politically they show similar trends too. They both are quite good at PR, Hitler being able to militarize and put troops in west Germany, taking the Sudetenland and the rest of the Czech, and finally Poland before anything was done. The Muslim rats are also able to blow up innocents and get away with it and not look too bad. Also, especially with Hezbollah, they both greatly improved the area through schools and public works to win the favor of the people who care less about ideals and more about living a better life. Another instance that helps with PR. The muslim rats are also quite closly alligned with big business, meaning their oil companies, which Hitler controlled to give him his power. There will be a world war in the lifetime of our children that we will probably lose if something isn't done now.

Answer 3

C'mon, the Nazis were an organised war machine, not oppressed people. Islam is a religion, muslims are its people....who by and large are peace loving despite the brutality of the Koran. The Bible is far more violent and hateful. All that seems to matter is whose religion is bigger or stronger at any given time. I personally believe that religion causes wars, not just one singled out religion. I don't have need for religion.

Answer 4

I doubt it. Hitler was insane. There's not really any other explanation for why he thought he could take on the entire world with a country possessing almost zero natural resources.

Iran is indeed in a similar situation, albeit they have a bit more oil than Hitler did. However, I doubt that the leaders of that nation are fool enough to try and take on the world as Hitler did.

Answer 5

Well, yes and no... they're not the only ones that promote Nazism in the military....hell, the US does it. It's a practice called Dehumanization , and the purpose of it is to make it easier to kill another human being without becoming unreliable. If you serve, you find yourself using terms like "skinnies", "gooks", "Charlie", "haj", "towlheads", etc...

Point is, if you're at war with someone, you don't want to think of them as a fellow human, only your enemy, your target.

Answer 6

No. They've been at this for centuries; there's nothing new about it. Resurgent, maybe. Remember, most all those places that letters were written to and became books of the New Testament and all of North Africa including Egypt, not to mention Jerusalem itself, were part of the Roman Empire and at least nominally Christian until overran by the armies of Islam. And they ***** and moan about the Crusades!

Answer 7

The Islamo-Fascist PIGS are the new nazi's of the 21 Century. WWIII started 9/11/01!!!!

Answer 8

If there IS a WWII, it will be fought against fanatical muslim organzations and the countries that support them.

Answer 9

well everything is changing before they kill burn and destroy families in a slow time (WWI)just because they were Jews , now they crash plains destroy families due to and anger for the Persia war in 1991 when bush father was in front of the USA. and they blame it on their religious faith, but is not much of that is because they dislike the fact that papa bush got them mad and victorious ge came back home and now that his soon is on the with house they want to get revenge.

Answer 10

Muslim fanatics are ten times worst then Nazism not that Nazism wasn't worse unto itself but , the Nazis were evil and murderers, the Muslim fanatics believe in sacrificing themselves for the name of god (Ala) they are more dangerous because they scarifies themselves and put their children in danger to be killed to put the blame on their enemy.

we can forgive the Arabs for killing our children we cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children
we will only have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more then they hate us (Golda Meir's words)