2006-08-11 08:17:58 · 12 answers · asked by eventhorizonbm 3 in Sports ➔ Baseball
Of course, and it would be more entertaining for the audience. You would have 9 Barry Bonds on the team!!!!
2006-08-11 08:20:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't be conscious of something in regards to the NBA being in Europe yet i'm very familiar with the NHL doing their annual excursions for the duration of the pre-season and it consistently produces extra followers for NHL communities. With MLB I experience it must be a blended bag with the objective to communicate - the yankee previous time meets the British previous time of soccer (soccer)? initially i could assume the solid British to look in droves to work out the "Yankees" as, nicely face it they have arguably between the main suitable names in activities - i do no longer think of they might assume to income greater of an purpose audience than say Manchester United. followers would or won't injury out in fights contained in the stands. at the instant there are hockey golf equipment throughout super Britain - i think of baseball may well be a problematic sell because of the cricket followers. i've got seen some Cricket Qs in this internet site in Baseball and that they at the instant are not friendly in direction of baseball gamers or followers right here. i think of that's a solid concept yet i could wish that MLB chooses properly. i'm no longer offered on the concept that super Britain will take to baseball as say Japan or different Asian and South American worldwide places have. Italy won't take to it besides as say the Netherlands. contained in the tip, I speculate that the main suitable success will come from Netherlands, Belgium, or perhaps the tinier united states of america of Luxembourg the place accepted George "Blood and Gutts" Patton is buried.
2016-09-29 04:16:45 · answer #2 · answered by kroner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, and Barry Bonds would last 10 more years. Of course he'd need a size 11 cap.
2006-08-11 08:20:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
taking into account that probably about 75-80% of all Major Leagures are using 'roids in some form right now, none of them are good enough, even with the drugs, to carry the jock strap of some of the games all-time greats who were clean. (i,e,: Ted Williams, Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Joe DiMaggio, Mickey Mantle, Jackie Robinson, Ernie Banks, Roberto Clemente, etc.)
So, in answer to your question....NO!
2006-08-11 08:22:24 · answer #4 · answered by rahkokwee 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. And the Steroid users would get sniped.
2006-08-11 08:26:34 · answer #5 · answered by hammerthingy66 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
GREAT QUESTION. the players would be stronger than they were originally, however all the stars will go to MLB. it's where the money is.
2006-08-11 08:20:44 · answer #6 · answered by Conservative Texan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As far as hitting the ball, yes. But is it right? No!
I think the # of years they would play would decrease, as other health problems would arise,.
2006-08-11 08:25:41 · answer #7 · answered by Tracy M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Higher level of drug play and, consequentially, higher level of adverse side-effects, too.
2006-08-11 08:22:36 · answer #8 · answered by Sam 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The players would all have high squeeky voices, small testes, and all the games would be tied.
2006-08-11 08:19:55 · answer #9 · answered by elguzano1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hell yeah i miss the roids
messed up my fantasy league ..
numbers whent up down
all kinds of crazy stuff
2006-08-11 08:19:05 · answer #10 · answered by bluff_mike 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋