regardless if there were WMD or not. The man was a sociopath, who murdered 1000s of innocents. Forget about the whole your president lied about WMD, and think about the outcome. Before the insults start, let me just say, "if" we were lied to, yes I think going to war under false pretenses is definitely wrong. But I honestly don't care if WMD ever existed, I believe it needed to be done. No I'm not a conservative, I am a liberal, just to get that out of the way. Now go ahead and rip me apart....
2006-08-11 08:15:12 · 13 answers · asked by Chrissy 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
(bubba) of course I don't think so.. THAT WAS THE POINT!!
2006-08-11 08:22:34 · update #1
WMD's aside he is still an evil man and shoulve been shot on the spot that they captured him. IF we wouldve left him as dictator..people would be dying anyway..Now at least they are dying for a cause..I hate war...but it seems to be the popular thing these days
2006-08-11 12:05:55 · answer #1 · answered by aoinerekai 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know for sure if getting rid of Saddam is more important then getting rid of all the other evil dictator in the world but I will say that if they lied about wmd's to get us into Iraq the least they could have done was come up with a good plan to win.
2006-08-11 08:29:11 · answer #2 · answered by DEEJay 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
What you are forgetting is the 3 words that are missing from our governments condemnation of Saddam's evil ways which is..."with our help"..which continued because.."we didn't care". I agree with you that he is a horrible person but truth be told, our government condoned his actions until the time was right to take him out of power by any means necessary. Anyone who rips you apart is not listening to the honest virtues of the good hearted human being you are and the fact that your right...he is a sociopath and should have been made an example a long time ago and made an example of to the rest of the sociopaths.....especially the ones our government puts into power.
2006-08-11 08:30:50 · answer #3 · answered by Charlooch 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I believe we should have removed him from power. BUT, we needed to finish the job we started in Afghanistan. And now we're losing ground there AND militant Islam is spreading regardless of what you hear. Just look at Somalia.
2006-08-11 08:34:29 · answer #4 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know the answer to that, but I do know that the thousands of innocent Iraqis and American soldiers would still be alive today if we never got rid of Saddam.
2006-08-11 08:31:39 · answer #5 · answered by truthyness 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
WMD's aside? leave em there they were there. Yes! He needed to be removed, But it shouldn't stop there either, the steam roller needs to continue...We need to cut through Iran, and syria. Only then will we have peace in the Middle east.
Hell Nuke em Till they Glow!! Let them start first, I would like them to start with San Fran frisco!
2006-08-11 08:30:06 · answer #6 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Definately should have been removed for 'office', Dictators are bad for the free people of the world.
2006-08-11 08:19:52 · answer #7 · answered by cbatb 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Since when did it become this governments business to invade and overthrow leaders of other countries.
Yes he was a despot, but who died and appointed us police of the world?
2006-08-11 08:40:05 · answer #8 · answered by PARKERD 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. I think the people of Iraq would have suffered a whole lot less if the US and Britain had just stayed out of there.
2006-08-11 08:22:21 · answer #9 · answered by Drewe 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I'm glad he's gone...and there were WMD's, what do you think serin gas is??
2006-08-11 13:50:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋