English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If we lived in anarchy, these guys would always be on the bottom of the food chain.

2006-08-11 07:46:46 · 6 answers · asked by butnozzle 2 in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

It depends what you mean by anarchy. If you mean a situation in which everyone was running around killing and stealing with impunity, no supporter of anarchism would be supporting that situation. Most believers of anarchism believe in decentralized democracy - decisions made by small groups of people, rather than by a large group that includes people who aren't really affected by the decision.

For example, while anarchists believe in democracy, who gets to decide what you have for lunch? Surely it won't be put up to a vote by everyone in the United States. The circle of decision makers is reduced until only those most affected by the decision have a say. In many cases, this becomes a government of one - thus anarchy.

Random killing goes against this principle, because the victim of the killing should be the one who has the most say in whether he is killed or not, becaue he is most affected by the decision. If there are murderers running around, then everyone who is a potential victim is affected, and thus everyone should have a say in whether the murderers should be allowed to roam freely.

2006-08-11 08:27:23 · answer #1 · answered by cyu 5 · 0 0

I will agree it depends on what you call anarchy. But I take from this question you are a republican who feels that anyone who isnt with the pres is unamerican (anarchist) It is usually because the reshitlicans have pulled so much money from the poor to give to the rich that your so called anarchists cant eat!

2006-08-11 15:45:24 · answer #2 · answered by trl_666 4 · 0 0

Good point. They do seem to be the passive-aggressive, snarky little twits who won't stand up to a barking dog.

2006-08-11 14:52:43 · answer #3 · answered by badbear 4 · 0 1

HA HA nice! lol

2006-08-11 14:52:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Ironic isn't it?

2006-08-11 14:52:58 · answer #5 · answered by Nikki 6 · 0 1

because thy are fags

2006-08-11 14:52:00 · answer #6 · answered by Erich J 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers