Who exactly would approve of such a movie? and why?
2006-08-11 07:34:43 · 9 answers · asked by Man_With_No_Name 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Looks beyond ridiculous to me. I won't be going to see that.--- I would go see "Crocs on a Speedboat" though :-)
2006-08-11 10:01:47 · answer #1 · answered by emmadropit 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am looking forward to it and think it will rock! The producers wanted to change the name of the movie and Samuel L. Jackson protested because the main reason he signed up to do the movie was because it is called "Snakes on A Plane".
2006-08-11 14:54:22 · answer #2 · answered by bottleblondemama 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's not to understand? It wants to achieve "cult" movie status through the buzz it's generated, with it's very simple title and premise. A bad muthaf**ka vs. an airplane full of snakes sounds like what's destined to be a guilty pleasure experience, I'm interested to see.
2006-08-11 14:54:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A better question would be... are people so hard up for entertainment that they'd spend their hard earned money on such drivel?!?
2006-08-11 14:39:06 · answer #4 · answered by cgspitfire 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think the whole idea of that movie was stupid. how do you get a bunch of poison snakes on a plane.
but it think it would be a good movie, even if the idea is stupid.
2006-08-11 16:22:31 · answer #5 · answered by lil_aea 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Beats me--- I bet the sequel will be "Crocs on a Speedboat" or some other random crap like that.
2006-08-11 14:38:41 · answer #6 · answered by What gives? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
snakes on a walrus!
2006-08-12 17:40:23 · answer #7 · answered by beardedoctopus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
people that get paid a lot of money. for shame!
2006-08-11 14:37:32 · answer #8 · answered by Grand_Slam_21 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
idiots!
2006-08-11 14:39:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋