Most people who've spent a great deal of time researching the backgrounds of US Administrations have found that over the past five or more decades, 80% of each has come from the "invite only" private membership of the Council on Foreign Relations. Including Presidents. The Council was initially established to influence politics in favor of finance and industry. Now, they comprise most of our Executive and Cabinet postions, regardless of which party is in office.
Which do you believe? Are both parties aimed at the same globalist objectives while presenting a facade of differences, or are both parties truly opposed to each other?
2006-08-11 07:33:36 · 6 answers · asked by shorebreak 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
The council on foreign relations was definitely established as a takeover of the government by the bankers, the wealthy industrialists and their lawyers. Most of them supported the Republican policies. Don't forget the old saying, "The business of America is business". There is no doubt that business interests are what drives policy. This was true then and its still true today.
Now, to answer your question: The Republicans want to get the most business they can for their friends so they can receive more power, more votes, more money, ect. The Democrats hope to get 75% of what the Republicans are getting from the same people.
2006-08-11 12:43:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well it is getting harder and harder to tell the difference between the two parties, I mean come on, I never though I would see big government Republicans and big business Dems lol
then a choice for president from two skull and bones members? seams kinda strange to me.
also most of the big shots from each party has been at the bildenburg thingy they had up in Canada not to long ago, I just hope they are not evil like some people say.
2006-08-11 14:41:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think both parties are not on the same "globalist" agenda. the liberals have a vision of a humanitarian effort where the entire world is a socialized, totally "fair" and economically "balanced, " while conservatives are mostly concerned with the interests of the United States around the world.
2006-08-11 14:40:32 · answer #3 · answered by Matt S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
both parties have globalists in them. Just more come from the repooplican side
2006-08-11 16:00:09 · answer #4 · answered by trl_666 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are opposed more than ever. Power corrupts, and both parties are constantly scrambling for power.
There is corruption globally as well, it's not just the US.
2006-08-11 14:39:49 · answer #5 · answered by northernbornsoutherner 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Different agendas. Same methods.
2006-08-11 14:41:07 · answer #6 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋