would change their perspective on the global Islamic terrorism and that Bush really is not the evil one here?
2006-08-11 07:28:34 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, I'm pretty sure she'd find a way to blame Bush for that too. In fact, why don't we blame Bush for tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, and all other disasters in the world? And don't forget wars. Every war that takes place is because of President Bush. Hell - I think Bush isn't the greatest president out there. I don't think he's the best America could do - but Cindy Sheehan and some other liberals make me want to defend him until my dying breath.
2006-08-11 07:34:08 · answer #1 · answered by Charli 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Airliners crashed into the the world trade center and the Pentagon. Americans beheaded on video tape in Iraq. Yet "they" think Bush is the real terrorist...
Unfortunately, a Kaytusha landing at their feet would have no effect. Neither will the plot that was disrupted yesterday... It says in the bible somewhere that all who have not come to Christ by a certain time during the Tribulation, never will because their hearts become hardened to His love. Same principle here, cept Bush obviously isn't Christ...
2006-08-11 14:35:03 · answer #2 · answered by trc_6111 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No they'd blame Bush for it then hopefully the missile would cause some kind of trauma that made them lose their tounges. Then there would be a good reason for all that bla bla bla that comes out of their mouth.
2006-08-11 14:40:30 · answer #3 · answered by locksniffer 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No they would continue to blame President Bush, instead of moveing on with their lives. Cindy Sheehan is nothing more than a glory hog. She is loving the spotlight while dishonering her son who died fighting for what he believed in.
2006-08-11 14:33:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
You're sick. Sheehan may make a lot of noise but she has a very valid reason. Bush IS evil, but he's not the only one. So "Katusha" that.
2006-08-11 14:34:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
i'm in israel, and i'm a liberal. i don't want to see any more lebanese civilians killed just as i don't want to see any more israeli citizens and soldiers (like a cousin of mine) killed. i want hezbollah stopped.
bush sucks and terrorists suck. anyone who wants to kill others is evil. it just sucks to have to choose between two evils, and i would personally feel better if there was someone better than bush running this whole thing, even if he is (luckily) very much on our side.
2006-08-11 14:37:07 · answer #6 · answered by kittens 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hey give her a break she is just a psycho mom that was worried about her son.
Were right around 300 mil population. One crazy mom is not bad odds.
Fact is most women don't like their adult sons. They are often overly critical of what their sons do.
It could be worse.
Go big Red Go
2006-08-11 14:34:19 · answer #7 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No.
Just because terrorists are evil doesn't mean Bush isn't breaking the law as well. If we are going to claim to be a nation of laws, then the ends cannot justify criminal means.
2006-08-11 14:32:32 · answer #8 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hey screwed, do not forget George Bush sent her son to his death so she is entitled to say whatever she wants - this is, after all, America where the deaths of soldiers guarantee your right to freedom of speech, no matter how ignorant yours is!
2006-08-11 14:35:11 · answer #9 · answered by commonsense 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
um no. see i've noticed that none of them make it over the ocean. that means almost all the american deaths since 2002 are because george sent them to stand within range of the enemy.
we had to take the fight to them to give them a fair shot at getting any of us. that was dumb. that was our president's idea. over here they seem to have a harder time cobbling together weapons, which is why they had to hijack planes.
any other questions?
2006-08-11 14:32:34 · answer #10 · answered by uncle osbert 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋