IF Bush was able to run for president again, would you vote for him? (ARE you old enough TO vote?)
2006-08-11 07:14:55 · 32 answers · asked by da dude 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It depends who runs against him, but if it is in the likes of the clowns the Democrats nominated the last 2 elections, then the answer is absolutely YES, he's got my vote.
At least President Bush had the courage to take on Islamic extremists and terrorists. It is long overdue!
It is due, in large part, to President Clinton inaction that we are in the situation we are in now. Have you forgotten the 1st terror attack on the World Trade Center in New York? How about the attack on the Cole? How about other attacks during Clinton Administration? Due to his inaction, and charming ways with the Muslim terrorist loving UN people, President Bush has inherited a very dangerous situation that culminated in the 9/11 terror attack.
If you don't know, the 9/11 terror attack was years in the planning. Yes, contrary to the nonesense the liberals have spewed, President Bush had nothing to do with this attack. While President Clinton avoided military confrontation, and allowed the terrorist cells to grow and get stronger, President Bush had the courage to deal with this dangerous situation head on. None of us wanted war, but waiting longer would have made the situation even worse down the road. War on terrorism had to be waged, and I am glad that President Bush did it. If only President Clinton had done it when the situation was easier, we would not be posting here right now about this topic.
Even though I don't agree with everything President Bush has done, he and his administration have done an incredible job in light of the terror and natural disasters the U.S. has been through since 2001. The economy was already in a recessionary mode in the last year of Clinton's Administration, and President Bush has helped the U.S. come out of recession fears into a growing economy.
The biggest problem this administration has is the lack of Public Relations, and talking about its accomplishments and the situation we are facing. While President Clinton could sell ice to the Eskimos, President Bush can't seem to sell baguettes to the French. President Bush is not the master orator and charmer that Clinton is. That is the Bush Administration biggest issue, and unfortunately, perception is what the people understand as reality, despite of actual reality. That is why you see the terroist groups using their own media outlets to make up people's mind through perception, at any cost, with any lie. Unfortunate, but true.
2006-08-11 07:21:51 · answer #1 · answered by EDDie 5 · 5⤊ 9⤋
top that line has been broken. Hillary Clinton is to evaluate to Obama previous due Tuesday or early Wednesday. So it is going to the two be Obama or mccain. enable us to prefer Obama will win for the grace of all that's bodily effectual in us of a. Obama 08!
2016-11-04 09:18:29 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gah! If Bush was able to run for president again, I think that would end up driving me out of this country. What a f**up that guy is!
2006-08-11 07:41:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
Look at his record of failures, the facts ! And if you would vote for him again you have some problems! The country is a F***in mess because of him , And that is the truth. So why don't you people wake up and see Bush is a loser!!“ This president is unique in his failures.”
And then there was this split ballot, comparing the George W. Bush presidencies failures in distinct areas. The George W. Bush presidency is the worst since:
“In terms of economic damage, Reagan.
In terms of imperialism, T Roosevelt.
In terms of dishonesty in government, Nixon.
In terms of affable incompetence, Harding.
In terms of corruption, Grant.
In terms of general lassitude and cluelessness, Coolidge.
In terms of personal dishonesty, Clinton.
In terms of religious arrogance, Wilson.”
2006-08-11 07:31:08 · answer #4 · answered by jdfnv 5 · 11⤊ 4⤋
It depends on who he is running against!!!...but I doubt it. If he was running against the devil incarnate, Hillary, well yes. But I would likely vote for a Blue Dog Democrat or maybe an Evan Bigh or Bill Richardson.
I voted for him twice, but consider him a mediocre President. He's done a better job that Gore, who is now reduced to peddling global warming in his private jet, or Mr. Theresa Heinz who makes outrageous claims that he would have prevented the violence in Lebanon. However, Bush has made lots of mistakes, from big deficit spending to out-of-control illegal immigration.
2006-08-11 07:35:05 · answer #5 · answered by Arthur M 4 · 3⤊ 6⤋
No, I would not, if I were an American citizen.
I am not eligible to vote for him, however, and have never been elible, as I am not a citizen of the United States. I am therefore free of the dilemma of who to vote for and/or whether to vote in the United States.
The following script might provide you with some insight:
DIALOGUE
George W. Bush” Then I presume you are a Noble?*
Osama bin Laden: I am so accepted by all men of noble birth.*
George W. Bush: Have you traveled any?*
Osama bin Laden: I have.*
George W. Bush: From where to what place have you traveled?*
Osama bin Laden: Traveled east over the hot burning sands of the desert.*
George W. Bush: Where were you stopped at?*
Osama bin Laden: At the devil’s pass.*
George W. Bush: What were you requested to do?*
Osama bin Laden: I was requested to contribute a few drops of urine.*
George W. Bush: Why were you requested to do this?*
Osama bin Laden: As a token of my renouncing the wiles and evils of the world and
granted permission to worship at the Shrine.*
George W. Bush: At what Shrine did you worship?*
Osama bin Laden: At the Shrine of Islam.*
George W. Bush: Did you ride?*
Osama bin Laden: Yes, I rode a camel until I paused to dismount.*
George W. Bush: Then what did you do with your camel?*
Osama bin Laden: I tied him.*
George W. Bush: Where did you tie him?*
Osama bin Laden: I tied him to a date tree, where all True Shriners should do so.*
George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden together in unison: Yes, I pulled the Cord, rode the hump, I have traversed the hot arid sands of the desert to find Peace and rest in the quiet shades of the Oasis.*
Footnote:
* The Shriners’ Recognition Test
According to a manuscript of George Lauterer, founder of a Chicago-based
corporation that specializes in Masonic regalia, this is how two Shriners
recognize each other.
What do you think of it?
Lots of Laughs!
2006-08-11 07:42:20 · answer #6 · answered by spanner 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Just to clarify eDDie, Clinton was in office for 1 MONTH when the first WTC bombing occured. No more terrorism on US soil for the rest of his administration. BTW, he didn't shift the blame to Bush I either, he started fighting back. Of course republicans where hampering him every step of the way by denying the appropriate funding.
I'm so sick of you anti-Clinton gestapo jerks misrepresenting history. It's your fault that there is such anti-Bush sentiment. It's payback for the Clinton withhunts.
2006-08-11 07:48:18 · answer #7 · answered by scott j 3 · 0⤊ 6⤋
Yes I'm old enough to vote and you are damn right I would vote for him again.
2006-08-11 07:52:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
yes I am 27
and I didnt vote for him the first 2 times, why would i vote for him again?
so the answer would be a big HELL NO!
(I am neither a Dem or a Reb, I am 3rd party member)
2006-08-11 07:21:01 · answer #9 · answered by friskygimp 5 · 11⤊ 5⤋
Nope, twice was plenty - not that I'd consider a Democrat, mind you.
At least, not until they come out of the left woods and start nominating candidates with some centrist views.
And, no, Queen Hillary the Great does not qualify on that measure.
2006-08-11 07:19:22 · answer #10 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 7⤊ 6⤋