And if so, where would be the least likely place a bomb would strike and fall out be avoided?
2006-08-11 06:49:43 · 17 answers · asked by Easter Bunny 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
If we lived our lives worring about bull sh*t bombs and such we wouldn't be living now would we... (in fact I'm now typing this comfortably from my fall-out shelter) J/K
Anyways I feel it is something to worry about when it gets closer to those 5 years... As for the location BFE!
2006-08-11 15:24:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I saw a site that said that it will occur before or on Sep, 12th 2006.
It is pretty clear what and why nuclear war will start. This site says that it will be around the Euphrates River.
Great proof.
Take a look. If you don't believe then you can just have a laugh.
http://www.lastdayswarning.clearwire.net/
2006-08-12 08:43:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vietnam substitute into an all-out conflict with tens of millions of youthful adult adult males drafted and enlisted in uniform. The conflict sectors of the financial gadget might improve however the civilian sector languishes. plenty cotton textile substitute into used for militia clothing that there substitute right into a scarcity of a few styles of civilian clothing. the comparable is going for some nutrition products. for the time of wars some human beings - the protection contractors - make loads of money on an identical time as the country's civilian desires are omitted. additionally, wars are high priced and reducing taxes on an identical time as spending those greater suitable trillions on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan drains the treasury and spells financial disaster. that is not "the troops" who could be keeping "us". There could be no separation, no branch of the yank human beings into "troops" and "us". that is all persons who could be doing the scuffling with. If a topic is considerable adequate to deliver the militia, if that is that loads of a threat to our us of a, then each and every able-bodied American could be interior the combat.
2016-11-04 09:16:08 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The threat of nuclear war has been around since the fifties. At various times it has been considered imminent and unavoidable.
The world continued on anyway.
We can't control everything in our lives. We can only work for a better world and pray for peace. We have to go on living inspite of the danger.
2006-08-11 07:01:34 · answer #4 · answered by CoolLuke 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, but saying that, the best place to live would be Antarctica, the next best would farther than 500 miles from a major city with a range of mountains between you and the city, preferably upwind of said city. You would also need a fallout shelter, and lots of stored foods.
2006-08-11 06:58:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i assume there's going to be a nuclear war here within a week or two.
i'm in israel, and the least likely place is new zealand. i was there a few months ago and you couldn't hate that place even if you tried. it's also quite a remote spot.
2006-08-11 06:53:39 · answer #6 · answered by kittens 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only people crazy enough to actually use a nuclear weapon are these islamic terrorists. If they ever get thier hands on one, I have no doubt they would use it. That's why the US is trying so hard to stop worldwide nuclear proliferation.
2006-08-11 06:58:26 · answer #7 · answered by jim 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran will strike Israel before they realize USA can not stop them in time 2-3years the ball will be rolling aftermath. WOrld war next is inevitable.
2006-08-11 06:56:26 · answer #8 · answered by Stephanie D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nuclear war no.
WW3 yes
Thought about this, safest place New Zealand or Peru/Bolivia (Amazon)
Scary the above expected it living in Israel!!!!!
Where is Noah and his Boat man?
2006-08-11 06:59:11 · answer #9 · answered by ii337 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes WWIII involving Russia Israel Iran India and China
2006-08-11 06:54:54 · answer #10 · answered by Jay 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋