English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I read this article about it and I'd like to know more.
http://www.crystalinks.com/holographic.html

2006-08-11 06:31:01 · 2 answers · asked by nicemachine 2 in Science & Mathematics Physics

2 answers

The Bohmian Interpretation of QM isn't a generally accepted idea, especially the holographic one. If you're interested look up "Bohmian Mechanics" and try to find something written by someone with a PhD in Physics. They have some researchers looking to see if they can verfiy it, but not many. The problem is that it fails to explain some things the Copenhagen Interpretation explains, but it doesn't offer anything testable in addition to that interpretation. (From my understanding). I read a bit about it last year. So, to answer your question more directly, yes there is some support, but mostly challenges. Lots of literature about it. It's more of an outdated idea now.

2006-08-11 07:26:58 · answer #1 · answered by Davon 2 · 0 0

He took the basic premises of quantam physics and stole that idea and then named it after himself.

Original.

2006-08-11 13:37:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers