English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or, who thinks WW3 started in 1979 Iran? With the kidnapping of Americans. And continued with Beirut Marine barracks bombings, Munich Olympic killings, USS Cole attack, 9/11, Spain train bombings, British train bombing, ect.

2006-08-11 06:00:50 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

14 answers

Yes, dealing with the Muslim terrorists is long overdue. I am glad that finally we have a few world leaders taking the stand against terrorism, and doing something about it. Thank you to the USA and allies!

I am sick and tired of hearing Muslims leaders in the U.S. go on TV, claiming that Islam is such a "peaceful" religion(!) Well, thank Allah Islam is a "peaceful" religion. Can you imagine if it weren't??!

It is time for the good Muslims to stand up and unequivocally condemn Islamist terrorism with no uncertain terms, not "and," "if," or "but" comments.

For those who believe that the extremist element in Islam is small, the numbers are staggering. There are 1.2 billion Muslims in this world. Lets take a very liberal view that only a very small percentage of Muslims are exterme, while the rest of the Muslim world is very peaceful. So if only 10% of Muslims have extreme point of views, and may be a threat, and must be dealt with, meaning dealing with 120 million Muslims! How about 1%? Then you must deal with 12 million Muslims. How about 1/10 of a percent? Then you must deal with 1.2 million Muslims. The numbers are staggering! How do you propose dealing with even the "very low" figures of 1.2 million Muslim extremists?

It would be to the benefit of the World to rid of Hezbollah, Hamas, the Syrian and Iranian regime. It must be done to finally have a chance for peace in the region and the world.

2006-08-11 06:08:06 · answer #1 · answered by EDDie 5 · 0 0

Um....the kidnapping of Americans happend WAY before 1979. When Thomas Jefferson was president, a radical Muslim group kidnapped and tortured men aboard a maritime ship. They have always hated us.
As for WW3: No, I don't think this is WW3 but I DO believe we are at war.

2006-08-11 06:04:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

dont you love the religion of peace.

The only way out of this is to destroy the enemy. Starting by fire bombing the 5 largest cities in Iran leveling them and killing all thier inhabitants, then continue down the list until we get an unconditional surrender. When we are done with Iran, we move on to the next.

2006-08-11 06:07:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think sooner or later some country in the middle east is going to come to America and start a war here, then it would be World War 3...

2006-08-11 06:15:56 · answer #4 · answered by whatisn'twouldn'tbe™ 4 · 0 0

No, Israel isn't to blame for something yet protecting itself. evaluate the reality that Israel is located on floor that selection into the unique native land of the Jews in antiquity. They have been purged by applying the Romans, and scattered over the panorama. The land substitute into in no way owned by applying Arabs, because it substitute into grew to become over by applying the Ottoman Turks and later held by applying the British. The very call "Palestinian" comes from "Philistine" a human beings greater heavily linked to the Greeks, who weren't Arab, of direction. One should additionally contemplate that Yassir Arafat, the chief of the PLO on the time, substitute into Egyptian. the subject is that Israel is a Jewish state, which Arabs see as an insult to the "purity" of what they see as a right now increasing Islamic international. This substitute into much greater of an affront to them while Israel particularly plenty kicked the hell out of them in a conflict with supposedly plenty greater suitable and greater effectual Arab countries. The UN will follow their line of starting to be a "Palestinian native land" inspite of the undeniable fact that their genuine objective is the removal of Israel. It could be considered that the individuals of the UN are greater often than not antisemites.

2016-11-04 09:07:46 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

we are in ww3 but this time there are no battle filed, it is every where . no western or eastern nations are safe. the only to win is to bridge the gap bewten the east and west in politices and policy and to sepreate religion from states just like the US did

2006-08-11 06:13:58 · answer #6 · answered by WEEDG 3 · 1 0

after finishing 3 year PhD in international political affairs i think were not yet involved in WW3 but its soon it would involve USA ISREAL IRAN SYRIA HIZBOLLA EU CHINA THNAX FOR A PERFECT QUESTION

2006-08-11 06:07:25 · answer #7 · answered by Thoginh 2 · 0 0

I think that this could possibly become WW3 but only time will tell...they name them afterward.

2006-08-11 06:05:41 · answer #8 · answered by jillymack06 3 · 1 0

Read the book, 'Nostradamus World War 3'.
You'll get some answers.

2006-08-11 06:09:28 · answer #9 · answered by lizzyloulou123 2 · 0 1

We are not as of yet involved in WW3.

2006-08-11 06:04:12 · answer #10 · answered by rltouhe 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers