English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the reason is in their attacks on innocent civilians died.recently in mumbai. the uk ofcourse foiled their attempt to do another 9/!!. had those terrorist groups did not kill them all those people might still be suffering from poverty, and other problems. these terrorist groups sent all those people where they need not face any problems. so those terrorist groups deserve nobel peace prize as the people who died in their hands got eternal peace.

2006-08-11 05:28:47 · 8 answers · asked by evelyn 3 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

some people misunderstood my sarcastic caustic remarks made against those religious terrorists caused for the death of innocent civilians in all countries . i disdain them and denounce their path. i feel they are to be thrown to the crocodiles in an ocean. i request you to modify your answers.it is never my intention to support those cannibals

2006-08-11 06:05:34 · update #1

8 answers

You have a right to your opinion, but just because someone dies violently or at the hands of someone else does not mean they get an automatic bid into Heaven! These militant groups are often the cause of many of the problems. They didn't bring about "true" peace. Yeah, their blatant and brutal attacks caused many their lives, but what kind of peace is that!!! They are not Ghandi or Mother Teresa, their acts do not work in an attempt to save the world. Instead, they cause fear throughout their lands and the U.S. There's no PEACE in that!

2006-08-11 05:37:55 · answer #1 · answered by allknowing 3 · 0 0

you're extensive wakeful that Alfred Nobel, who the prize is termed for, replaced into the inventor of dynamite, are actually not you? yet, regrettably making conflict safer isn't a qualification for a Nobel prize. Prizes are presented for achievements in physics, chemistry, physique shape or drugs, literature and for peace. no longer conflict. And, in case you're thinking, particular you are able to win it greater suitable proper than as rapidly as and limitless distinctive have. z

2016-11-04 09:03:16 · answer #2 · answered by winstanley 4 · 0 0

You sound like one of those people that drank that poison to get "eternal peace." You give me the creeps. I think it is wrong of you to be on here condoning mass murder. What if it had been your family? Move to another country weirdo!

2006-08-11 05:36:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Luckily for all concerned; no one really gives a sh!t about your misguided opinion. It seems clear to me that you don't have any understanding about the topic your attempting to address. Perhaps you should go out side and play and leave philosophy to your betters.

2006-08-11 05:35:28 · answer #4 · answered by perfecttiming1 4 · 1 0

Um no violence, no matter the motive, deserves that. your citing that they attained "eternal peace" is your own ideological opinion.

2006-08-11 05:35:36 · answer #5 · answered by Becky M 2 · 0 0

Considering all the people who have won that thing, sure, what the heck.

2006-08-11 05:35:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

is that a "holy war mantra?" do you really believe that shite that you are saying? what about the families of the victims???? are they to suffer the same fate

2006-08-11 05:43:45 · answer #7 · answered by Summer Rain 3 · 1 0

your views are way jacked up!!!

2006-08-11 05:33:14 · answer #8 · answered by cindy loo 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers