am i the only one who thinks that all that or nathan the magician were robbed,and do you also agree with piers that as soon as someone cry they get more votes i dont know about all of you but that quick change thing didnt do it for me
2006-08-11 05:17:41 · 13 answers · asked by angelina_mcardle 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
Personally i think this show is really rigged and stupid. They judges are pointless... they give checks to people even though they suck. Like this week Hasselhoff told the girl she has to work on her singing but....still gives her a vote for being a "darling" ...its completely stupid....but i do agree with you aabout the magician ..he was really good!
2006-08-11 05:20:16 · answer #1 · answered by Irv 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I loved Quick Change and was amazed and impressed by what they could do in seemingly no time at all. No idea how they can do that. I was impressed far before the insults and the tears. I agree that Piers was an idiot to them.
I also agree that America votes based on emotion rather than true talent. But then, so do the judges it seems. In this respect, Piers is the most objective one. I was really surprised at Brandy in being SO hard on that one young African-American girl though, I think she was about 11, whose singing was absolutely amazing for her age. Brandy told her that her pitch was all over the place and that she tried to sing a song that was too old for her. Is Brandy afraid of the competition?
I loved the group All That too, but the fact is, there's only one $1 Million dollar prize, so someones got to be eliminated. I didn't think they were that amazing to get $1M.
2006-08-11 05:29:52 · answer #2 · answered by LindaLou 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah Peirs shouldn't of said anything bad about the quick change artist because America voted for them so they could show peirs how wrong he was. I personally thought Peirs was right. I really wanted Natasha Le to win.
2006-08-11 05:25:10 · answer #3 · answered by Bloop 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree neal e boyd do not have gained. He would not suck yet there replaced into more effective acceptable expertise contained in the competition. Eli or nuttin yet stringz must have gained. Oprah isn't demanding, he's. he's so emotional and cries to a lot. i don't believe of i ever spoke of a interview without him crying. Your acceptable Katelyn maher must have gained, she replaced into obviously the most known one. merely examine out youtube. Her videos were considered more effective than the different contestant
2016-11-24 20:12:52 · answer #4 · answered by speelman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The quick change was original... but they are all multi layered special costumes that fold and remove quickly... no trick there,... especially when you can se them shimmy and struggle behind the cloth.
If you want to see a really impressive quick change act... check out Arturro Bruscetti.
2006-08-11 05:25:41 · answer #5 · answered by freaknerd 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I enjoyed both acts but preferred the magician more. It's true, if someone cries people will feel sorry for them and vote for them!
2006-08-11 05:25:05 · answer #6 · answered by M☆mma 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It does seem that if you insult a contestant they win the contest. Cases on Point: Celtic Spring and Quick Change.The get criticized and make it to the finals.
2006-08-11 05:25:25 · answer #7 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ITs all a matter of opinion, I liked them but i also missed Nathan's act because I was on the phone w/ someone important. I thought it was cool how he did that thing last night though! I woudln't have minded if he went on. But i must say that half of his act was his girls (from previous nights of what I saw) and you coudl say he used sex to get votes.
2006-08-11 05:21:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd rather watch my toenails grow.
2006-08-11 05:22:48 · answer #9 · answered by CaptJack 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't. Am I missing out?
2006-08-11 05:22:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋