What I have written below is an answer to a question similar to yours, that I posted on Yahoo Answers several weeks ago.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bush and Hitler are equally immoral, it is just that Hitler had more talent and resources at his disposal to exercise his immorality to the extent that it had greater ramifications for the world. Bush is a political thug but an incompetent one, while Hitler was a criminal mastermind. Bush would like to impose his will on other nations, but given the political environment he is in, he neither has the intellect or power to do that, while Hitler was more intelligent in manipulating the democracy in his own country to relinquish more of its power to him.
Its sad that the line of demarcation that is separating Bush, the leader of the free world, from one of the most pernicious despots of all time, is a more restrictive political environment and lack of military genius. I will thank God today for inventing incompetence and idiocy. I see his divine plan now. He counter balances tyranny by making some tyrants bumbling incompetents.
2006-08-11 04:48:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lawrence Louis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yopu sir are a moron.
1. Patriot Act, Hitler started the freedom act wich reembles the patriot. **Hitler did not have a 9/11 idiot.
2. Guantanomo Cuba, Hitler put jews in comcentration camps and bush puts arabs in concentration camps.***The Jews in those Concentration camp were innocents. The ******* @ Gitmo are not.
3.Bush and Htler both hated socialist and communist***I hate socialists and Commies too, must be Hitler.
4.They both were very stupid***Not as stupid as you are.
5.hitler was a jew killer and bush is an arab killer***Really, when did Bush kill and Arab? I must have missed that newsflash.
6.hilter and bush both want to rule the world ****Hitler did, Bush just wants to make it through the next year and a half.
Oh, by the way, go f*ck yourself moron.
2006-08-11 04:46:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hitler was a socialist. It was the National SOCIALIST German Workers' Party.
Guantanamo is hardly a concentration camp. These guys live better than a lot of hard-working Americans. They get three religiously-appropriate meals every day, they are allowed to have religious books and materials, and they are not being exterminated by the thousands.
Bush is not an Arab killer. If we wanted to, we could simply bomb them all back to the stone age. We are trying to simply get rid of the ones who want us all dead.
Do some research on FACTS. Hitler had much more in common with today's liberals. Honest. Go read what he wanted besides the extermination of Jews. Hitler was a flaming liberal.
2006-08-11 04:43:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
dude go buy a brain. your argument is completely stupid and not supported at all.
obviously you havent read enough into the situation to find out that everything you listed from freedom and patriot acts to concentration camps is completely wrong.
1. http://www.rense.com/general58/diff.htm
read it. it might help you get a sense as to why they are completely different.
2. if you want to let more possible hijackers kill thousands of people again, be my guest. better to be safe than sorry. bush decided to do this to better protect his country--that is his job. if he didnt make these camps and there were more hijackings, youd yell at him anyway! theres no way to make you happy.
3. uhh okay except that was only what the whole cold war was about. why dont you just compare truman and eisenhower and the whole united states to hitler? youre practically saying they are similar because they both like cheese. so ... ? so does 3/4 the world! the whole US government as well as our allies disliked the idea of communism .
4. excuse me, i dont think you went to yale and received a bachelor of arts degree in history and attended harvard business school, so i reallly dont think you should be talking.
5. take a look at number 2 really.
6. uhhh nooo bush doesnt want to rule the world. he wants to help the US grow and go in the right direction, which is precisely why he ran for the president of the United States. You had a choice, if you didn't want him as president, you could have paid more attention to his campaign and not vote for him. and even more, if you dislike him that much, why dont you run for president okay? try making 300,000,000 people happy all at the same time okay? or just move to another country. you dont have to live in the United States if you dont want to okay? I'm sure no one would have a problem if you just got up and left right now. Please, go ahead.
2006-08-11 05:09:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by leelee316 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dont you just hate it when people want to draw a conclusion based on bias opinions. Man, get some history knowledge, perform your own opinion based on facts and then spread your opinion. Ever been to gitmo?? If he wanted to put arabs there he would need alot bigger place. Its sad to see that the rights men and women had died for support people like you that dont take advantage of gaining all the information before developing an opinion.
Maybe he needs better public speaking classes but he obviously knows how to keep it in his pants and not cheat on his wife.
2006-08-11 04:46:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Brian M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
that is not honest to analyze Bush to Hitler or Gitmo to a concentration camp. those held at Gitmo have been scuffling with against the U. S.. those held in concentration camps have been accountable for no longer something yet being "undesirables". FYI Hitler did no longer thieve an election he substitute into freely elected. Bush did no longer make up lies to take us to conflict. in basic terms ask each and all of the Dems that agreed with him on the commencing up of the conflict. Neither Bush or Hitler are/have been clinically insane or disturbed. each and all of the Bush led to 9/11 theories have been disproved. it extremely is ridiculous to analyze the patriot act to the guidelines in Germany which genuinely made Jews/blacks/homosexuals/catholics/psychological... retarded no longer human. Bush did no longer positioned any US electorate into concentration camps (in contrast to FDR)
2016-11-04 08:57:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not a huge Bush fan, but as someone said earlier, this is very poorly supported.
This is not even in the form of a question. I would say that you need to find a forum, somewhere, and not use this site to throw out your poorly educated and uninformed opinion.
2006-08-11 04:46:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by <3 The Pest <3 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1} nothing the same...read both
2} they are prisoners of war, not political prisoners that are going to be gassed and burned in ovens, also they are eating better than they ever had before.....
3} as do most of the world
4} stupid is not making 300,000,000 dollars, becoming Governor, and then President.....no matter what you say, that is not dumb
5} Bush is not killing Arabs......Arabs and Muslims are killing Americans, we are defending ourselves....
6} Bush does not want to rule the world, he wants the people of the USA safe and secure from Islamic Extremists terrorists
so, with all this straightened out......and your creditability shot.....can't you do better than that?
2006-08-11 04:45:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Worse men Bush is in Boston having fun
when a lot of civil and babes are getting kill in Libano.
And Israel is USA MASK.
At the END sens to me like he is not the one who runs the country
I think USA is run by The top of the ARMY and the JET-SET JEWISH
And the top of the ARMY don't want to go to jail and The Jewish don't want to stop their Credit cards and Banks and lottery and their stock market business also with the ENERGY CRISIS USA have neather.
THEY WANT TO GET THE CONTROL OF ALL THE OIL COUNTRIES and they dont care to kill 7000 years of History in Lebano.
2006-08-11 04:48:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush is a Nazi in his genes.
His grandfather, Prescott Bush, was a partner in Brown Brothers Harriman and one of the proprietors of the Banking Corporation Union. Both companies played a key role in financing Hitler on his way to power in Germany. On 20 October 1942, the US government ordered the confiscation of Ranking Corporation Union, owned by Prescott Bush, and in addition seized the Dutch-US Trade Corporation and Seamless Steel Corporation, both administered by the Bush-Hamman Bank. On 17 November of the same year, Franklin Delano Roosevelt confiscated all assets of the Silesian American Corporation, again administered by Prescott Bush, for trading with the enemy. George's great-grandfather, God's warrior, Samuel Bush, father of the Nazi Prescott Bush, was the right hand man of the steel magnate Clarence Dillon and the banker Fritz Thyssen, who wrote a book called I Paid Hitler, joining the German Socialist Workers Party in 1931.As in Hitler's case, the first thing he did was to surround himself with a clique of con artists such as himself, men obsessed with the intimidating power of force. Like Goering, Goebbels, Himmler, Mengele, or Eichmann, the Texan president searched for the protective shell of an iron guard, often more war-like than himself to impede any temptation to doubt, and men of a common stamp: all oilmen. The vice-president, Dick Cheney, came from Halliburton Oil, the chief of the Pentagon, Donald Rumsfeld, from Occidental, another oil company, the National Security Advisor, the spinster Condoleeza Rice, whose name in Spanish by a twist of fate means "with sweetness", was on Chevron's board of directors and has oil tankers named after her. Then there's the Secretary of the Interior, Gale Norton, who is also linked to the oil industry, as is Bush Sr. with the Carlyle oil group, and the current president, Bush Jr. with Harkins Oil.
2006-08-11 04:48:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by jdfnv 5
·
0⤊
0⤋