For republicans?

Question

can you explain to me why we should feel safer with bush as president...its been 5 years since 9-11 and he is just talking about doing something to secure the border with mexico...the airports were not prepared to look for liquid bombs....he has cut terrorism funding to some of the most populated cities...less then 1% of cargo coming into ports are checked....where is the security?

why can't he enforce a draft...they have both houses of congress

Answer 1

hi don; and how are you today
well we have had this problem of the ports and borders for years and it goes back to prohibition times .
WITH the enormous amount of cargo coming into america and its wide open borders we have never been able to prevent anything from coming in .
YES we can and have been able to detect shippments of prohibited goods from getting in but only with well placed people in the organizations or captured members who know the plans to bring in the prohibited goods .
TODAY we face the real threat of a nuclear weapon being placed aboard a vessel that can enter any harbor in the united states .
THIS will cause a sever blow to the american way of life when it happens and i have no doubt in my mind it will at some point .

NOTHING can be done short of preventing all cargo from entering the U.S. that has not been checked and transferd from a secure port that is not on our shores and this is impossible to do without increasing the costs of goods dramaticaly .

SO we must enter into negotiations and build trust again that america will not exploit the people of the middle east and that trade will be conducted openly and above board and not with a few oil shieks as we seem to have done in the past .

THE saudi families own hundreds of millions in property in the finest community's in america and investments in our corporations making them partners with american political family's mentioning names only offends the right wing conservatives that support Bush so i will not name names .
BUT THE BUSH family is not the only ones in america to cosy up to these people in an effort to make deals to secure oil at set prices for negotiated terms like WEAPONS for oil leases and price fixing .
HAD we not engaged in so many back room deals with oil distributors and nations we would not have this mess today .

HONESTY does have its merits in all things and it has been the dishonest nature in which we have approached our dealings in the middle east that has made america a target of terrorism .

THESE policies have been supported by the american government for to long and we need to openly admit our role in the wars both militaristic and economic against some of the people in the oil states .

ONCE this is out in the open and we can assure the people of that region we will no longer conduct our business in such a manner ever again can we begin to establish some peace .
TILL this is done we will be open to attacks that can not be prevented from happpening in or on american soil .

I do believe that the next target is San Fransisco a port city of liberals that will unite america in an all out war with the middle east for the control of oil . this is the ultimate goal of american oil companies and it is tassidly supported by the current administration .

THEY may not be directly involved in the attacks or even permit them to happen but it is my belief they know it is coming and have been preparing for the solution as they see fit and the middle east is the targget for take over and control .

OUR money is the world currency and only supported by the price of oil .THIS is the main reason we must not allow anyone else to control the region and it is the mission of the U.S. to comtrol this for its own national and monetary reasons .

WITH this as the only reason for our involvment in the middle east it would be better to open honest relations with them and control american companies that operate in there own intrests today and not americas .

Answer 2

There has not been an attack on american soil or intrests since Bush has gone on the offensive. None of the other adminstrations can say that. Also there have been numerous terror plots foiled becasue of the Patrioit Act and other survelliance methods have been incorporated. All federal agencies are sharing information and also sharing information with the international community. I know that there have been plots foiled here in Miami, Canada, and England. Until current measures and methods are breeched then I will trust the Commander in Chief and know that he and his administration is doing everything they can to keep us protected.

Answer 3

Would you feel safer with a democrat in office. There policy is to let all come when they want. Under the last democrat there was no security at all. Many things have been secured with Bush in office that would have been overlooked with the dems. So Yes I feel much safer with Bush in the White House.

Answer 4

Let's go back to the 70's when Carter was president. Our military was cut and defense spending was practically null. We were constantly getting our planes hijacked and our embassy's in the middle east were always under attack. Americans were taken hostage and so forth and so forth. Carter had the same attitude that the Kerry's, Kennedy's, Mckinney's, Gore's, Pelosy's and Dean's of today have. Wave the white flag and cut and run.

Thank God, along comes Reagan. Defense spending was sky high, but allot of ground had to be made up, thanks to Carter. Results, one threat by Omar Kadafi, he is quickly neutralized. The 40 year Cold War with the Soviets starts to come to an end.

Bush Sr. comes to office and quickly takes action on Saddam Hussein's aggressive attack on Kuwait in an attempt to take over a coastal region. This would enable Saddam easier access to WMDS. His army is quickly neutralized as they began to wave white flags at our troops.

Bill Clinton comes to office and what does he do? He cuts the military and reduces defense spending. He becomes a playboy in office. Terrorist organizations see this and they start to regroup. They had a practice run on WTC in 93, they had a practice run on the USS Cole in 98.

GWBush takes over a mess! Thanks Bill Clinton. G.W. has done allot to prevent an attack in the US. We've taken the fight to the terrorists on their soil. He created a homeland defense department. Our borders are being more carefully watched. Many 1st and 2nd leutenant terrorist are sitting in cells in Guantomeno Bay. YES! I do feel safer with GW BUSH. We haven't had an attack since post Clinton 911.

Answer 5

So you would vote for democrats, who do not want to secure the border until EVERYONE who is here is given a free path to citizenship, then maybe we can secure it. He cut money that was not needed in some places, and was in others, making sure as many people can be prepared as possible. I have yet to see a democratic initiative on screening cargo. And there are always going to be new ways for terrorists to try and attack us, that is why we have to kill them before they kill us.

Answer 6

Taking the faster poster's factor that there are not rather any "leaders" interior the Republican social gathering, there are certainly a number of Republicans who've publicly endorsed violence against the USA government in some style or yet another. that's truthfully treasonous, noticeably whilst it comes not from any mere citizen, yet from an elected respected who has sworn an oath to uphold the form. and despite the fact that it rather is anecdotal, regardless of if an inordinately intense share of folk on the novel superb suited flock to Yahoo! solutions, particularly some the failings one sees in posts on indexed right here are very worrying, and doubtlessly very risky. That such a lot of human beings have been weened off of severe theory and fed propaganda for long sufficient that they are receptive to such radical ideas will truthfully ought to be addressed in our society as urgently and heavily as achieveable.

Answer 7

They don't. They truly don't feel safer, but they ahve to argue for their cause, even if that means giving up everything to make Chimp look good. At this point Cons/Repubes have NO validity and are only exposing themselves and self-hating brainless sheep.

Answer 8

well your boy clinton cut are military in half when he was president. So since bush can't enforce a draft, that means we have to rely on volunteers. so blame your boy clinton. If you don't believe me look it up.

Answer 9

Compared to where it was after the attacks on 2/26/93, it is FAR better.

Answer 10

WRONG!!! We haven't had any terrorist attacks in the US lately and the borders are being secured and the airports are prepared.