2006-08-11 01:58:44 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
its a steam powered car
2006-08-11 02:04:40 · update #1
you can go dig it up in the canadian north
2006-08-11 02:00:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
transportable reactors are many times no longer a reliable concept as a results of fact of cost and complexity (which ability they could in elementary terms be maintained by utilising specialists) and protection concerns. If a motor vehicle with a nuclear reactor crashed, it may desire to contaminate the encompassing section. it extremely isn't any longer a topic for nuclear skill flowers, that have various protection measures a motor vehicle could no longer have. the belief has been heavily considered interior the previous, although. The Ford Nucleon replaced into meant to have a nuclear reactor, despite the fact that it on no account went previous theory sketches.
2016-12-17 08:58:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No clue, but as far as I know, Uranium is a radioactive substance with tremendous health risks if in the wrong hands. That's probably one of the reasons why it's a very strongly regulated thing. Even though i admit, with the current gas prices that sounds like a very tempting idea, it would seriously doubt the benefit when it involves damaging radiation or even worse!
2006-08-11 02:06:09 · answer #3 · answered by azeera_2000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
According to the USA-Israeli theories u will be a terrorist if you are in the Middle East or from any county near it or have any relation to any of them but on the contrary you will be a hero and a scientist if you are from the civilized west countries although you are doing the same thing :)) what a shame!!!
A whole world is being led like a shepherd that is looking after his goats!!!!!!
2006-08-11 02:13:11 · answer #4 · answered by napoli 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Libyan Terrorists.
But the uranium won't power the car. It will create the electrical charge needed (1.21GW) to power the flux capaciter.
2006-08-11 02:02:00 · answer #5 · answered by DiamondDave 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran or North Korea
2006-08-11 14:06:54 · answer #6 · answered by kimba 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No where because uranium is to dangerous to give out
2006-08-11 02:23:30 · answer #7 · answered by stick to my guns 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tehran
2006-08-11 02:01:28 · answer #8 · answered by sparkletina 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably you could siphon enough out of my blood and my old combat gear from lovely Iraq. I'm sure there's enough in there to get you going.
2006-08-11 02:27:36 · answer #9 · answered by Goddess of Nuts PBUH 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Watch out here comes homeland security
2006-08-11 02:01:37 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you know that Uranium is radioactive?
2006-08-11 02:01:14 · answer #11 · answered by michael2003c2003 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋