should people be restricted frm traveling from one part of the world to another,just because of ecomic reasons

Question

economic reasons i mean poorverty and low standard of living, eventhough its ditermined that they don't post any danger (terrorist) to the intended travel country?

Answer 1

Do you mean if people cannot afford to travel should they not travel? If people cannot afford to tickets or travel expenses then they should not travel.
b

Answer 2

No this would be wrong as people have moved around a lot for centuries. It has be found that people did move around a lot more than historians once thought. The recent upsurge in genealogy has helped to bring this to light. The famous plumber Thomas Crapper left his home hundreds of miles from London at the age of 8 to find work!
The idea that poor people live in small towns all their lives may be imagined more than fact.

Answer 3

If they are going to another country purely to raise capital via the social security system, then of course they should be stopped!

The UK should adopt a system similar to Australia, where you can only apply to go there if you have a certain amount of money and/or have a formal skills set that is required within the country and cannot be fulfilled within. Then that would put the UK on a far better standing with its finances!

Answer 4

ah, i understand you! planes use a lot of fuel, and fuel is costing way too much right now b/c they aren't producing enough. so, yes, i agree with you- i think all commercial flights should be temporarily halted until the fuel crisis is over. with the fuel saved by not flying, gas prices would go down! besides, with all the problems abroad, we really need to stay home anyway.

Answer 5

us

Answer 6

IS THAT WHERE YOU COME FROM ?????