English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Assuming that complete recovery were instantaneous, would you be willing to accept a year of total paralysis below the neck to prevent the otherwise certain extinction of a species of animal?

2006-08-11 01:13:20 · 10 answers · asked by Kain 5 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

10 answers

It all depends on the animal. If it's a madagascar hissing cockroach, no way. Maybe for an eagle or peacock or to bring back an extinct animal like the dodo or non meat-eating dinosaurs

2006-08-11 05:39:10 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 1 1

No. The world is constantly evolving, and that (rightly) brings about the extinction of animals. Species were dying out far before we began mucking things up for them.

2006-08-11 01:18:30 · answer #2 · answered by Mary D 3 · 0 0

You sound as in case you think of the ideals of others ought to have some bearing on your guy or woman determination of no remember if there's a god or no longer. in case you have not got self assurance those human beings, why ought to you care no remember if the god they made up will settle for you later? you need to ascertain what it relatively is which you think. no longer human beings! it is your duty to discern issues out on your guy or woman incredibly than only settle for what human beings say is real. There do look distinctive Christians who declare to have as quickly as been atheists. i've got self assurance that they've been plenty greater in all likelihood to have only no longer cared approximately faith, or they have been only blind to its claims. I carry that suspicion by way of fact the arguments they use to justify theory in God look very unconvincing, and their information of technological know-how is so often distorted, no remember if out of lack of expertise or mendacity. Edit: go with to work out what I propose? check out those links Pastor artwork published. lots of them declare the international is only 6,000 years previous. that should tell you many approximately how nicely Christians understand technological know-how.

2016-12-11 06:51:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Depends what animal. If it were mosquitoes or pigeons, probably not (I don't care much for mosquito bites or malaria, and pidgeons are just flying disease carriers).

If it were plankton, i don't think I'd have much of a choice (we're all dead without plankton).

2006-08-11 01:18:53 · answer #4 · answered by 006 6 · 0 0

Sure, what better way to get my husband to finally wait on me, instead of himself all the time! LOL...

2006-08-11 01:18:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Dude.. I asked this question like 2 weeks ago.. THE EXACT SAME ONE.. you gotta come up with something original.

http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Asg_3YzTQi0TQR5dJCICvP7AFQx.?qid=20060721084621AA8NZFd

2006-08-11 01:56:06 · answer #6 · answered by Imani 5 · 1 1

No. You know what they say when you assume you make a *** out of me and out of you.

2006-08-11 01:17:01 · answer #7 · answered by milknmycoffee 1 · 0 1

no, animals will be extinxt anyways, it's inevitable

2006-08-11 01:16:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no..i'm a f***ing selfish a$$hole

2006-08-11 01:16:30 · answer #9 · answered by still breathing 6 · 0 0

no

2006-08-11 01:18:07 · answer #10 · answered by stillness 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers