English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-11 00:37:46 · 20 answers · asked by mouthbreather77 1 in News & Events Current Events

20 answers

it would stink but yeah

2006-08-11 01:00:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No because then next thing you know we'd have to worry about rapes.I think that they would still find a way to hide explosives.Maybe in their rears.I wouldn't want to see 80 year olds naked either.

2006-08-11 00:47:28 · answer #2 · answered by redanimalmuppet 3 · 0 0

I was pondering this today.

When will we be asked to change into surgical robes before flying?

Humans will still be able to find ways of instilling fear. We can swallow things that we can later use, or find things even on a plane that we can use to cause harm.

I don't really care. If my time is up, my time is up. Hopefully I'll die with a smile on my face :)

2006-08-11 00:41:14 · answer #3 · answered by ◄ Mal ► 3 · 1 0

Actually it would be a good idea to have a nude airways' company. In that case air travel would be safer then now. But whoever wants to hide a bomb or something can hide one inside his/her body.

2006-08-11 00:43:47 · answer #4 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0 0

I accept as true with stylish. in case you vow to not set foot on an airline, then the terrorists have succeeded. regardless of if, in case you nonetheless return and forth by air and pass on with existence, for sure displaying that they've made no impact on the way you reside in any know, then you definately win. My advice is this - fly with self belief. The hazard point for the airlines is as much as crimson, by using fact of this not something receives previous protection. interior the easy of it, return and forth is somewhat safer immediately than the day till now immediately. in simple terms wait and notice... do not whinge with regard to the long waiting strains and adult men dealing with your outfits. they're in basic terms doing it to maintain you and each physique else risk-free. As for Bush, i would not be too confident approximately him. In an MSN article I wasn't shocked to ascertain - "top Minister Tony Blair, travelling interior the Caribbean, briefed President Bush on the area in one day, Blair’s place of work pronounced. there replaced into no instantaneous public reaction from the White residing house. Bush is spending some days at his ranch close to Crawford, Texas." do not go away it as much as Bush to maintain issues risk-free. unquestionably everyone has to do their section in preserving their eyes open in any airport that they fly out and in of, consistently examine the TSA's internet site for any updates on limited products, and supply comments to the airlines based on the provider which you obtain interior the protection line. If some guy in basic terms breezed with the aid of your bag, the airline and the TSA ought to grasp approximately it. Bush is one and we are many. all human beings ought to save air return and forth risk-free!! -Sarah

2016-10-01 22:44:53 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Okay! a bunch of naked people in an enclosed space. I don't think so

2006-08-11 00:41:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We ALREADY have air pollution.
do you want to imagine a religion fanatic crashing naked through your window ?

2006-08-11 00:40:43 · answer #7 · answered by volksbank 4 · 0 0

Don't know about it being safe but it would be interesting!!

2006-08-11 00:40:15 · answer #8 · answered by sarah k 4 · 1 0

then the pilot needs to do sex (or masterbate) three or four time before the flight of air-plane ;)

2006-08-11 00:50:41 · answer #9 · answered by joy_csharp 2 · 0 0

naaaaaah just a different set of problems

2006-08-11 00:44:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

not sure bout ur logic but i dont think there r other places to hide if u think about it. xxxx

2006-08-11 00:41:10 · answer #11 · answered by chloe b 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers