How did WTC 7 collapse? look at this map?

Question

http://www.wirednewyork.com/wtc/wtc_map.htm

WTC 7 had buildings between it and the others, film on the day clearly show no large fires, (which have never before 911 or since 911 caused a steel framed building to collapse) Larry Silverstien admitted on film to pulling the building.

The small amount of damage to WTC 7 could have caused a partial collapse, but not a complete collapse.

How could WTC 1 collapsing have caused the demolition of WTC 7, some hours later? and not damaged WTC 6?

If you look at the map, WTC 6 is in between the 2 buildings!
It don't make sense.

PedroJuanJulioDurante didn't look at the map. WTC 7 was not near enough to WTC 1 or 2 to be hit by 200 floors of falling debris.

Look at the evidence and not the propoganda.

After all why have the officials who destroyed evidence of this crime not been charged?

I mean the chap from the air traffic control center who deliberately took the audio tapes of that day and cut them up and distributed those bits around several different dustbins? He committed a federal offence of tempering or destroying evidence of a crime. Why was the wreckage of the WTC buildings disposed of BEFORE forensic examination could take place?

It IS dodgy, and these questions are not being answered by the authorities.

Kevin W, the site you link to raises many interesting points, Thank You.

I want to get at the truth, whatever and whereever that leads. I am not ruling ANYTHING out as impossible. but following the evidence.

This site looks at the evidence in an interesting way. Better than the 'official inquiry' which is clearly a cover up!

I shall read more and make up my own mind.

Answer 1

The following evidence supports the theory that WTC building 7, was indeed "pulled" as Larry Silverstien originaly admitted to. It also provides evidence that WTC building 1 and 2 met the same fate.

This is a good time to be examining the collapse of the towers, because we are finally starting to get some cold hard evidence, that show us, how those buildings came down. Here is some of the most recent irrefutable evidence available today.

1. We now have eye witness accounts, from people inside of the building, telling of explosions taking place, on different floors, including lower floors, just before the buildings went down. Many of the witnesses, were silenced when the buildings collapsed, but their accounts live on, in just released radio recordings. (I'll try to find them on the Internet for you. I heard the firemens radio conversations, not to long ago.) They went something like this, "What's going on! I'm on the 22nd floor, and I just heard an explosion." "I'm on 72, and I heard one too."

2. Photographs of the buildings, just before it went down, show molten metal flowing out, from the building. Structural steel requires temperatures, well beyond burning jet fuel, to melt. Further, the color of the glowing molten metal, is also representative of high temperatures, beyond that of burning jet fuel. See source at the bottom of the page, for detailed information, regarding structural steel melting points etc.
http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=4884818450327382904

3. A chemical analysis of the molten metal, found at the site, shows traces of a chemical called, "Thermate". Thermate charges are used by professional demolition crews, to cut through steel beams, to demolish buildings. Incidentally, the samples were recovered by a member, of the clean up crew, who kept it as a souvenir memento. Most of the scrap metal, including the pools of molten steel, were recovered by a demolition crew, and discarded. There are though photos, at ground zero, showing beams that have been shearded at a right angle: Slag is shown dripping from the process. Click on photo, in website below; for a close up examination.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2842384983834100001

4. Thermate traces have also been found, inside the bodies, of those exposed to the gases from the molten debris; people such as firemen and clean up crew members.

I found the following video clip, while conducting research. It has a bias slant, but is also very intriguing. Once you see it, you'll never be able to see the 9-ll tragedy the same again: I know I won't.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1519312457137943386&q=loose+change

Answer 2

Wtc 7 Map

Answer 3

Your kidding...two commercial airliners traveling at 500 mph and loaded with jet fuel slam into the towers causing massive structural damage, what little support remains is taken away be intense heat causing a combined total of 220 floors of steel and concrete to collapse into a relatively confined area surrounded by other buildings (like tower #7), some of those buildings burn for hours because there was no access to the area or water for that matter (220 falling floors tends to make for difficult access not to mention the loss of emergency personnel), come on...are you out of your mind?

Answer 4

There are a lot of possibilities.....the shaking of 1 and falling, then the pressure of the are air being pushed up from beneath.....there was walkways underneath the area from one building to another......and two stories collapsing would cause the building to fall...and if you got this info from loosechange...you ought to also read the below website, to get both sides

Answer 5

I will not entertain any 9/11 conspiracy theories, distortion of facts, and just general ignorance about what happened on that terrible day. Here's a short list of some things people can do instead of indulging these 9/11 nonsense theories:

1) go to the WTC site and pay your respects
2) give to 9/11 charities or organizations (not those dopey "truth movement" clubs)
3) read factual, legitimate accounts by actual rescue workers and survivors of the attacks.
4) see earnest movies such as "Flight 93" (A&E); "United 93," and "World Trade Center."

Answer 6

pedro, u smallbrain, wtc7 was 300 feet away, buildings right next to wtc1 and 2 did not collapse although the towers fell on it, they didn't fall because Larry Silverstein didn't own them, he only owned wtc towers, which all fell at free fall speed, which he(dumba$$) admitted was "pulled" a term demolitionist use when a building demolished with explosives. the only way to pay respects to those who died is to investigate why they died. all of u who are tired of hearing about it need to watch Loosechange, please,please

Answer 7

It sounds like you should watch the movie on www.loosechange911.com
It's pretty scary.
I'm not sure how I feel about the movie yet, (it's an hour long and I haven't finished it) but it poses a lot of interesting questions & theories about 9/11...
Enjoy!

Answer 8

it was a conspiracy set up by the american goverment no building as large as the towers has ever collapsed before through fire, both towers came down as if they had been demolished,
i have said this before but americans dissmiss this,
facts dont lie wake up america and oust your corrupt goverment before it,s to late for all of you.

Answer 9

it was damaged from the wtc and burn if you watch the hole interview he says "pull it " and he said to pull the firefighters because it was not worth them getting killed not the building

Answer 10

strategicly placed explosives planted by demo experts before so called terror act.