i'm talking about the one from (2002) i think. Starring Guy PEarce
2006-08-10 20:11:19 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
It was an okay movie. I still prefer the classic myself.
And, it co-stars Orlando JONES. I have no idea who Orlando JORDAN is.
2006-08-10 20:17:05 · answer #1 · answered by Jim T 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the movie is so-so but the Time Machine itself is great looking.
2006-08-11 03:19:51 · answer #2 · answered by Rrf00 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it could have been better, but then again the book was way ahead of it's time, so it's a tough standard to follow. I enjoyed the movie though, despite the reviews.
2006-08-11 11:58:14 · answer #3 · answered by Rixley 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really liked this movie, but I think it's movies you will either absolutley love or absolutely hate. It's definitely worth renting out IMO.
2006-08-11 12:42:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It had mixed reviews. Personally i thought it was really great and was a genious remake. I throughly enjoyed it. Great effects even though it was still a few years back. Especially when he saees what's happnening around him
2006-08-11 03:15:14 · answer #5 · answered by Mellow lazy guy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I liked it. But I still prefer the 1960 classic better.
2006-08-11 12:01:23 · answer #6 · answered by brainstorm 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I heard it was terrible but didn't see it. Only 27% of the 142 film critics surveyed by rottentomatoes.com liked it.
However, I can enthusiastically recommend the original, which was fantastic.
2006-08-11 08:43:54 · answer #7 · answered by Dunrobin 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I really liked it. Others may disagree but I have a huge obsession for time travel, so i was fascinated. If you're into time travel, i think you'll enjoy it.
2006-08-11 03:17:41 · answer #8 · answered by sunshynn17 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's okay. At least Samantha Mumba is easy on the eyes.
2006-08-11 06:41:53 · answer #9 · answered by etang 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I liked both movies and the book which is by H.G. Wells.
2006-08-11 03:17:26 · answer #10 · answered by mygrandmarose2002 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋