2006-08-10 19:02:48 · 19 answers · asked by sona_d 3 in Health ➔ Men's Health
The only thing he misses - is smegma!
2006-08-10 19:08:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Okay...please listen.
1. Women only like the look of a circumcised penis...but in the case of sexual pleasure, a women would prefer an uncircumcised penis because it is soft and sensitive.
2. I do appreciate what the person assumes, but whoever said that guys don't have time to clean their foreskin, is wrong. Cleaning your foreskin is very simple as a matter of fact, more simple than brushing your teeth or washing your hair. I know this as a fact, since I am uncircumcised and I go through these things everyday.
3. It is true that foreskin gives a higher chance of STD's...this problem can be easily solved by wearing a condom...SIMPLE!
So basically, circumcision is unnecessary and should not be done, unless there is a good medical reason.
2006-08-11 23:13:16 · answer #2 · answered by nmagny 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is medically proved that circumcised males have lesser chance of infection. The fold of skin attracts fungus & viruses
that relate to infection of STDs and AIDs. A circumcised person
is safer, sexual life is not impared at all.The Muslims do it out of
religious compulsion, and most Americans & Western world does it for health reasons,safety & avoiding risk of infection.
2006-08-11 05:16:02 · answer #3 · answered by stoneman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Generally nothing major, perhaps increasingly less sensitivity as time passes on because there's no foreskin to protect the glans. The only way it would cause problems is if something went wrong with the procedure, which can happen. Such complications could be too much skin removed, skin bridges, uneven scarring, and the random and extremely rare worse things.
2006-08-11 19:48:43 · answer #4 · answered by trebla_5 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely none. In fact, just the opposite. Most women report a higher degree of sexual satisfaction from a circumcised man than not. Also, not being circumcised can cause health problems for men....higher risk of infections.
2006-08-11 02:11:46 · answer #5 · answered by lizardmama 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No. I dont mean to offend anyone but I have read that uncircumcised penises pass HPV more than circumcised penises. If you are a busy male with an active lifestyle you might not have the time in the world to throughly clean it every morning and night.
As for performance I wouldnt know..I havent met an uncircumcised man, but I have seen babies. :)
2006-08-11 02:06:06 · answer #6 · answered by happybeanstalk 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
no not at all infact a circumcised man can give alot of pleasure to women for longer periods but he loses his sensitivity n ejaculates after long time
2006-08-11 06:40:43 · answer #7 · answered by natraj p 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2006-08-11 02:12:02 · answer #8 · answered by Eerin 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
15 yrs of good hetereo activity and no problem what so ever!! In fact many girls like it circumsized
2006-08-11 02:06:54 · answer #9 · answered by Casper 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wasn't sure if I was going to answer this or not. But I think circumcision has quite the opposite effect. It helps keep the penis clean, I think it looks nicer, the man has more control during sex - which mens better sex for both partners.
http://www.geocities.com/hotsprings/2754/womenpref.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15763713&dopt=Abstract
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15832878&dopt=Abstract
I've experienced/known of a lot of negative experiences with foreskin; but I will avoid TMI.
Lots of love,
Sara
sarr115@hotmail.com
2006-08-11 14:48:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I dont think so, all american men do it. opted out of it and didnt allow my son the operation. My husband didnt so it either as hes from mexico and hes fine.
2006-08-11 02:05:25 · answer #11 · answered by chicata25 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋