People are facinated with the amount of gore in movies nowadays. Do you think it's better or worse for movies?

Question

With recent horror movies, such as The Hills Have Eyes and Silent Hill, each has pushed the envelope of gore to a whole new level. Saw has been quite successful in light of its goryness, as well as The Hills Have Eyes and Silent Hill.

How do you feel about the amount of gore in movies nowadays? Do you like it, dislike it, or indifferent?

To be quite honest, I'm a little shocked when you compare the suspense The Shining had and the bloodfest Silent Hill had. Is this just a phase movie goers are into now or will this stay?

Answer 1

Funny, I did a paper on this back in school in 1980. The gore flix are not horror movies. There is no real, discernible plot, no acting - just slash, blood, violence. The movies have become progressively gorier & the gross-out factor has gone way out since Friday the 13th & Halloween initially premiered. When compared to something like Psycho or the Shining, The Mummy or Frankenstein, moviegoers would be bored to tears with the "classics". War of the Worlds (either version) was a truer version of horror than Saw - the total destruction of our world, humans being hunted as food, people having to leave their homes on foot in droves as they did in Europe during the Wars (something that has never happened on American soil) - to me, that was far more horrifying & frightening than the gore flix where you know it's all special effects, fake body parts & fake blood!
It's a trend - not one that will go away - but a trend nonetheless.
People will always be drawn to these films, but there will be other more quality movies produced in there too, that are better examples of "horror". Great question - thanks for letting me vent!

Answer 2

I think all the gore in today's horror movies are a bit too much. If you look back at all the horror movies that we call classics, they had little or no gore, yet scared people just the same. Horror is much more compelling when you have suspense; ie: not knowing what's around the corner or what you will find when you open that door, for instance. Horror is in the mind. Gore is just shocking for the sake of shocking.

Answer 3

Dude, get a existence videos at present are large, you merely ought to look deep into the sack. i do not recognize which era of movie do you imagine is giant(Prehistoric?) All i am going to allow you to recognize is action pictures right now are awesome. Many will quickly assemble cult following. Inception sucks thou. you're criticizing 3-d CGI. i imagine you're acceptable. a large type of the lads are turning out to be 3-d incorrect. Few like Avatar and Tron were given it acceptable(Tron suffered from a lack of plot besides the undeniable fact that). if you're asking about plot. Kubrick action pictures were under no circumstances widespread for plot. For the characters(strangelove,a clockwork orange), visuals(2001),horny images and cinematography(shining, barry lyndon) Robert Altman merely about under no circumstances had reliable thoughts Hitchcock had thoughts yet all had an similar characters, afflicted, no range. bypass AND examine those directors WORKS and then remark Paul Thomas Anderson Cameron Crowe Ethan Coen,Joel Coen Danny Boyle Scorsese (large Characterization) Spielberg J.Cameron Benigni (large thoughts) Plot:sequence of activities tale:you have to be understanding that keepsake HAS a number of the most complicated PLOTS The Godfather, Casablanca have effortless plots Actors: "DiCaprio is the recent Robert De Niro"- Martin Scorsese appearing at present has very much more advantageous because some a lengthy time period. i wager you've been hibernating you're saying Peter sellers, I say Jim Carrey(eternal Sunshine,guy on the Moon,The Truman prepare are type acts) Marlon Brando,Tom Hanks Robert De Niro, D.Lewis Al Pacino,DiCaprio(a lot more effective distinctive roles) Bogart,Seymor Hoffman Get your wondering immediately, bypass for your nearest theatre and performance some wonderful time.

Answer 4

actually in my opinion ,nowadays movie don't compare to the movies I grew up with in the eighties. though I haven't saw hills have eyes most of the modern flicks seem a little sanitized. I remember buying magazines like fangoria, and at that time the gore was almost a form of pornography.not just the major releases like nightmare and friday 13th,but especially the lesser known straight to video types.
until around 86',PG13 didn't exist, and since then all movies have gotten softer.with the mpaa increasing restrictions for whats allowable and so on.
that aside ,these modern movies don't have the smart psychological edge that films like the shining had so they try to make up for it with buckets of blood. apparently we see through that trick or you wouldn't be asking ?s like this.
I see no end in sight for this, the same goes with all genre of movies.we are all waiting for something to occur that causes the makers to shift from a "make a quick buck with recycled crap" mindset to "lets take some risks by gambling on..., get this,..... NEW IDEAS"

Answer 5

Honestly the gore doesn't really bother me as much as the fact that Hollywood is churning out horrible movies that need that to attract attention. A good solid story w/ plenty of suspense is what works!

Answer 6

Gore in cinema and Scares don't really have much in common....

I for one am a horror fanatic, i dint like much of the crap being released in theaters (there are a few exceptions).

I love true gore, pseudo snuff films, and extreme violence!!
But i love a good scare... now if you can find a film with both, being a perfect mix, now that's a movie.

there is not enough gore in movies today!!!!!!
there is not enough scare in most either!

if you talk about independent films, they tend to be scarier and gorier... High Tension, was released in America and cut to all hell, the original French version (Haute Tension) was both gory and scary... amazing and totally uncut, but not in English... but who cares the suspense is still there.

the fascination with gore, well IMO of course, is nobody wants to see the real thing, i have and its alot rougher than on the screen... its a get away and for people like me... it is what we want, to see really nasty stuff and know its not real but still find it utterly disgusting!

i don't know if that answers your question.

Answer 7

Personally I think it takes away from the story a bit. If you ellude to how much pain a person is in then I think the viewer gets the idea. If you Show the person the gore and blood and bones then it distracts the person from the film...In my opinion

Answer 8

It is an attempt by Hollywood to combat CGI with make up by producing zombie films. People watch them because they are there and that is it.

Answer 9

I usually close my eyes for the gory parts.