How can Cuaron (director) make such a suck a$$ movie, there was nothing in it but sex and it started off like in the middle of a deal and didn't give the audience time to adjust to the film, he also made Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Azkaban and did a poor job. Why give him these big name movies?
2006-08-10 17:10:16 · 7 answers · asked by sincerely, see me 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I agree. I actually fell asleep on it. Generally, in the recent past (and this may be completely irrelevant), I've noticed that films that begin with a party sequence have typically been terrible films (i.e., the film "G," especially). What's worse, in my opinion, is that the film drags, numerously, and has many unnecessary moments contributing to its gratuitous length (approx. 2 1/2 hrs). Although, the action sequences were pretty cool. And plenty of eye candy; but, other than that, two thumbs down. Seriously, I thought Bad Boys II was a better film.
2006-08-10 17:25:36 · answer #1 · answered by LifeTaughtLessons 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
funny I only saw the shootouts(which were the bomb i might add)
then again I love shootouts period
it sucked but only the sex scenes
so i guess guys and girls see differnt things at movies
2006-08-11 18:02:54 · answer #2 · answered by Xae 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I haven't seen it yet. But I think a lot of movies this yr weren't that good.
2006-08-11 00:15:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the movie just looked stupid to begin with so thank you for saving me some money
2006-08-11 00:15:35 · answer #4 · answered by guyver4 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tis the price you pay on a remake....but i wont lie the black chick looked way better on there then she did on pirartes of carra..2 lol
2006-08-11 02:58:21 · answer #5 · answered by tru1120 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
movie hella sucked
2006-08-11 01:50:31 · answer #6 · answered by ATXDesi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wtf
2006-08-11 00:16:13 · answer #7 · answered by mrmach@sbcglobal.net 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋